-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32k
gh-115634: Force the process pool to adjust when a process worker exits #115642
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
gaogaotiantian
wants to merge
3
commits into
python:main
Choose a base branch
from
gaogaotiantian:gh-115634
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+39
−14
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions
1
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2024-02-19-00-23-58.gh-issue-115634.wg-ec5.rst
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
Fixed the halt issue for :class:`ProcessPoolExecutor` when the task submission is fast to saturate **max_workers** and then all worker processes are killed due to **max_tasks_per_child**. |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is decrementing
_idle_worker_number
just after it was incremented by_adjust_process_count
, perhaps we can simplify this by adding an optional argument to_adjust_process_count
, e.g.self._adjust_process_count(increment_idle_workers=False)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can. As I said, I think explicitly decrementing the worker number at where a task is submitted is easier to follow.
_adjust_process_count
may or may not increment the idle workers, depending on whether the max worker number is reached. If we combine the option to may or may not decrement the counter, that might be harder to follow.increment_idle_workers
is not a good idea because it does not really mean anything.decrement_idle_workers
is acceptable, but still a bit twisted.The current logic is:
_adjust_process_count()
only adjusts process count, and change_idle_worker_number
accordingly. It does nothing else._idle_worker_number
is decremented_idle_worker_number
is incrementedI think this is much easier to follow than "figure out whether
_adjust_process_count()
should decrement the counter", because why would it? The function just_adjust_process_count
.