Hash files instead of relying on modification timestamps.

[tobiasraabe]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 70 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (4da749b) 94.96% compared to head (fec1272) 94.34%.

❗ Current head fec1272 differs from pull request most recent head 4061e6e. Consider uploading reports for the commit 4061e6e to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #469      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.96%   94.34%   -0.62%     
==========================================
  Files          99      104       +5     
  Lines        8794     9033     +239     
==========================================
+ Hits         8351     8522     +171     
- Misses        443      511      +68     

Flag	Coverage Δ
end_to_end	81.35% <53.92%> (-0.93%)	⬇️
integration	39.39% <32.50%> (-0.17%)	⬇️
unit	66.24% <72.85%> (+0.18%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files	Coverage Δ
src/_pytask/build.py	99.03% <100.00%> (+0.17%)	⬆️
src/_pytask/dag.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/_pytask/database_utils.py	94.28% <100.00%> (-1.46%)	⬇️
src/_pytask/nodes.py	86.61% <100.00%> (+1.69%)	⬆️
src/_pytask/path.py	93.58% <100.00%> (+0.73%)	⬆️
src/pytask/path.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
tests/test_cache.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
tests/test_database.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
tests/test_execute.py	99.15% <100.00%> (+0.02%)	⬆️
tests/test_hashlib.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 4 more

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.