Skip to content

Adding moments for AsymmetricLaplace and SkewNormal #5188

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

jlopezarriaza
Copy link
Contributor

Adding the moments for the AsymmetricLaplace and SkewNormal distributions along with corresponding tests.

@jlopezarriaza jlopezarriaza mentioned this pull request Nov 15, 2021
51 tasks
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 15, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #5188 (6079ffe) into main (275c145) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5188      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   78.09%   78.11%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          88       88              
  Lines       14149    14186      +37     
==========================================
+ Hits        11050    11081      +31     
- Misses       3099     3105       +6     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pymc/distributions/continuous.py 96.50% <100.00%> (+0.11%) ⬆️
pymc/distributions/discrete.py 98.33% <0.00%> (-1.10%) ⬇️
pymc/bart/pgbart.py 96.24% <0.00%> (-0.38%) ⬇️
pymc/smc/smc.py 98.30% <0.00%> (-0.05%) ⬇️
pymc/initial_point.py 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pymc/distributions/multivariate.py 71.47% <0.00%> (+0.19%) ⬆️

Copy link
Member

@ricardoV94 ricardoV94 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great 👍

@ricardoV94 ricardoV94 merged commit aae9dfb into pymc-devs:main Nov 15, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants