-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Change sapm to expect effective_irradiance in W/m2 #609
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
This feels like a change for 0.7 instead of 0.6.1 because it will break code. I'm not opposed to moving forward with a 0.7 release and skipping a 0.6.1 release. |
OK with me if we leave this for 0.7. It's an enhancement for consistency in the function level APIs, not a bug fix. |
OK, leaving this PR without |
@cwhanse do you no longer want to change the units? If so, we should close the corresponding issue. If not, perhaps we should merge this and make 0.7 the next release. I also have no objections to leaving it open during a 0.6.2 cycle. |
I still want to change the units. I was doing some housecleaning in my fork and deleted this branch without realizing that it is connected to this PR. |
pvlib python pull request guidelines
Thank you for your contribution to pvlib python! You may delete all of these instructions except for the list below.
You may submit a pull request with your code at any stage of completion.
The following items must be addressed before the code can be merged. Please don't hesitate to ask for help if you're unsure of how to accomplish any of the items below:
docs/sphinx/source/api.rst
for API changes.docs/sphinx/source/whatsnew
file for all changes.Brief description of the problem and proposed solution (if not already fully described in the issue linked to above):