-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.5k
DOC: Ambiguous description in to_parquet engine documentation #19669
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DOC: Ambiguous description in to_parquet engine documentation #19669
Conversation
This reverts commit bf59983.
…ing.py, and test_ewma.py
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #19669 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 91.57% 91.6% +0.03%
==========================================
Files 150 150
Lines 48817 48864 +47
==========================================
+ Hits 44704 44764 +60
+ Misses 4113 4100 -13
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Looks like some stray commits got into your PR. Do you need help cleaning up your branch? |
@TomAugspurger yes I need! I tried in several ways to clear the jump but I could not! can you help me? |
…OCS---Ambiguous-description-in-pandas.DataFrame.to_parquet-documentation-pandas-dev#19662
Ok, should be good now. I added a commit deleting your window-related changes. In general, when you make a PR you want to
And you do that for each PR independently. |
@TomAugspurger thanks for helping this newbie! |
pandas/core/frame.py
Outdated
'io.parquet.engine' is used. If 'auto', then the first | ||
library to be installed is used. | ||
Parquet library to use. If 'auto', the value from | ||
``io.parquet.engine`` is used. The default ``io.parquet.engine`` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would clarify "io.parquet.engine", as now it seems like a constant in pandas.io.parquet.engine, which is not the case, it is an option. Maybe leaving "the option io.parquet.engine .." as before is enough
@jorisvandenbossche I did the suggested fix, could you check it now? |
@gilbertoolimpio It seems you reverted the full explanation? My comment was only to keep the word "option", the rest of the modifications were certainly an improvement! |
@jorisvandenbossche Ops! now was better? =) |
Yes, that's better. Can you do the same for the other occurrences? |
@jorisvandenbossche newbie here! =) Thanks for your help! Now all updated. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, looking good now!
Ambiguity correction in documentation on pandas.DataFrame.to_parquet
git diff upstream/master -u -- "*.py" | flake8 --diff