Skip to content

DOC: correct merge_ordered example #19401

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 26, 2018
Merged

Conversation

raph-m
Copy link
Contributor

@raph-m raph-m commented Jan 25, 2018

… merge_ordered. adding a test corresponding to this example.
@pep8speaks
Copy link

pep8speaks commented Jan 25, 2018

Hello @raph-m! Thanks for updating the PR.

Cheers ! There are no PEP8 issues in this Pull Request. 🍻

Comment last updated on January 25, 2018 at 22:50 Hours UTC

@raph-m
Copy link
Contributor Author

raph-m commented Jan 25, 2018

Hi,
That's my first contribution to an open source project. Please let me know if I did something wrong :)

@jreback jreback changed the title issue #19393 DOC: merge_ordered Jan 26, 2018
@jreback jreback added Docs Reshaping Concat, Merge/Join, Stack/Unstack, Explode labels Jan 26, 2018
@raph-m
Copy link
Contributor Author

raph-m commented Jan 26, 2018

Hello, the appveyor test did not pass but the errors do not appear to be related to my modifications. Please let me know if I should make changes to pass the AppVeyor test.

@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche changed the title DOC: merge_ordered DOC: correct merge_ordered example Jan 26, 2018
@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche added this to the 0.23.0 milestone Jan 26, 2018
@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member

@raph-m Don't worry about the appveyor tests, that is indeed unrelated (and being fixed)

Looks good for the rest!

@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche merged commit 68cdd46 into pandas-dev:master Jan 26, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Docs Reshaping Concat, Merge/Join, Stack/Unstack, Explode
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

DOC: incorrect example result for pd.merge_ordered
4 participants