Skip to content

Fixed #12651: providing links to the .cum* in .expanding #12673

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

prabhjotsumman
Copy link
Contributor

@prabhjotsumman prabhjotsumman commented Mar 20, 2016

@sinhrks
Copy link
Member

sinhrks commented Mar 20, 2016

Should close #12651 (not #12561).

I think it is better to link each other via docstring as described in #12561, or use section links ( ..sealso:: ). It's unclear what the updated part tries to explain.

@prabhjotsumman
Copy link
Contributor Author

sectional links provided.

@prabhjotsumman prabhjotsumman changed the title Fixed #12561: providing links to the .cum* in .expanding Fixed #12651: providing links to the .cum* in .expanding Mar 20, 2016
@@ -578,6 +578,7 @@ they are implemented in pandas such that the following two calls are equivalent:
df.expanding(min_periods=1).mean()[:5]

These have a similar set of methods to ``.rolling`` methods.
Please see the :ref:`cumsum, cummax, cummin, cumprod <basics.stats>`
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wold expect a note:: section here explaining the differnce as I have noted in the issue

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented May 7, 2016

pls reopen if you like to update according to comments

@jreback jreback closed this May 7, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

DOC: improve cross-links in docs between .expanding and .cum*
3 participants