-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.5k
Series.sort_values doesn't support a by
keyword argument, but the documentation claims it does
#11540
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
this is just using the super docs |
Frame.sort_values and NDFrame.sort_values support |
take the by out of the shared docs and then add back as part of the doc string for DataFrame and NDFrame |
Important things first: I still think pandas is a really cool thing ✨, but I give up :( Building the docs without conda is just too hard - installing everything from |
and you need cannot JUST install |
@jreback If I take the by out from the shared docs and then add "by" parameter as part of the doc string for DataFrame and NDFrame, it will not include "by" in the parameter section. It is showing "by" docstring on top of shared doc . |
I just came up against this tonight. I this just lingering? Is the documentation wrong or is this a bug? |
Yeah this was not fixed...might coerce back into a df |
BUMP. Is this fixed? Still facing the same issue with .sort_values() |
pandas: 0.17.0
https://github.com/pydata/pandas/blob/1135ce34fc2fb995e239a7d36aee1b687ef69dd9/pandas/core/series.py#L1609 does indeed not support
by
, but the docs list it as a supported keyword argument.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: