Skip to content

dpkg package for jsoncpp #236

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
anirudhSK opened this issue Apr 8, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

dpkg package for jsoncpp #236

anirudhSK opened this issue Apr 8, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@anirudhSK
Copy link

Is there a ppa that hosts a recent version of jsoncpp? I am on Ubuntu 14.10, and the version available through apt-get is 0.6.0~rc2. https://launchpad.net/~fancycode/+archive/ubuntu/jsoncpp also lists the same version.

I am interested in using jsoncpp for a project and would prefer to install it as a library rather than including the code with the project. If I can help create a PPA archive, I would be happy to do that as well.

@cdunn2001
Copy link
Contributor

We are used on too many platform to distribute built libraries for each one. But if you set one up for us, that would be much appreciated. :-)

Now is a good time for it, as the code seems stable and bug-fixes have petered out. Actually, 2 PPAs could be helpful: 0.10.1 (which is binary-compatible with 0.6.0-rc2) and 1.6.1 (which requires C++11). Or whichever you think is most helpful today. Thanks!

@cinemast
Copy link
Contributor

Hi!

The package has been unmaintained the last years in debian (and therefore in ubuntu). We fixed that now and the 0.x.y branch should be always up2date.

Check here:

https://packages.debian.org/stretch/libjsoncpp-dev
http://packages.ubuntu.com/wily/libjsoncpp-dev

@cdunn2001
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the links. Interesting.

Your latest submission (the ARM fix, plus some back-ported code) is in 0.10.2-p1. I could rename that to 0.10.3 if that's more convenient. It would certainly be easier to sign.

@cinemast
Copy link
Contributor

No that's not required. The patch is already in, therefore I won't package 0.10.2-p1.

@cdunn2001
Copy link
Contributor

Copied links into wiki. Thanks again!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants