Skip to content

Disable usage of setrlimit in rustc_driver #5

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
nielx opened this issue Jul 1, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Disable usage of setrlimit in rustc_driver #5

nielx opened this issue Jul 1, 2018 · 4 comments
Labels
bug upstream Tickets that track the upstreaming of patches
Milestone
Rust on Haiku 1.29.0

Comments

@nielx
Copy link
Owner

nielx commented Jul 1, 2018

Since Rust 1.27.0 the compiler uses ​setrlimit to (try to) set the stack size. Haiku does not implement setrlimit for this command (according to the documentation). This leads to an error being displayed each time rustc is invoked.

Although the error is not fatal, it would be nicer not to display it.
@nielx nielx added the bug label Jul 1, 2018
@nielx
Copy link
Owner Author

nielx commented Jul 2, 2018

See the PR:
rust-lang#52002

@nielx nielx added upstream Tickets that track the upstreaming of patches waiting Waiting for an external action (like a PR approval) and removed upstream Tickets that track the upstreaming of patches waiting Waiting for an external action (like a PR approval) labels Jul 2, 2018
@nielx
Copy link
Owner Author

nielx commented Jul 4, 2018

The PR should be rewritten. New patch is on its way.

@nielx nielx added upstream Tickets that track the upstreaming of patches waiting Waiting for an external action (like a PR approval) labels Jul 6, 2018
@nielx
Copy link
Owner Author

nielx commented Jul 6, 2018

New PR: rust-lang#52100

@nielx nielx removed the waiting Waiting for an external action (like a PR approval) label Jul 10, 2018
@nielx nielx added this to the Rust on Haiku 1.29.0 milestone Jul 10, 2018
@nielx
Copy link
Owner Author

nielx commented Jul 10, 2018

Merged

@nielx nielx closed this as completed Jul 10, 2018
nielx pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 26, 2020
@richkadel
Merge pull request #5 from rust-lang/master
791cccc 
update from origin 2020-06-19
nielx pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 7, 2020
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#77616 - jyn514:no-normalize, r=lcnr
2e57231 
Don't run `resolve_vars_if_possible` in `normalize_erasing_regions`

Neither `@eddyb` nor I could figure out what this was for. I changed it to `assert_eq!(normalized_value, infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(&normalized_value));` and it passed the UI test suite.

<details><summary>

Outdated, I figured out the issue - `needs_infer()` needs to come _after_ erasing the lifetimes

</summary>

Strangely, if I change it to `assert!(!normalized_value.needs_infer())` it panics almost immediately:

```
query stack during panic:
#0 [normalize_generic_arg_after_erasing_regions] normalizing `<str::IsWhitespace as str::pattern::Pattern>::Searcher`
#1 [needs_drop_raw] computing whether `str::iter::Split<str::IsWhitespace>` needs drop
#2 [mir_built] building MIR for `str::<impl str>::split_whitespace`
#3 [unsafety_check_result] unsafety-checking `str::<impl str>::split_whitespace`
#4 [mir_const] processing MIR for `str::<impl str>::split_whitespace`
#5 [mir_promoted] processing `str::<impl str>::split_whitespace`
#6 [mir_borrowck] borrow-checking `str::<impl str>::split_whitespace`
#7 [analysis] running analysis passes on this crate
end of query stack
```

I'm not entirely sure what's going on - maybe the two disagree?

</details>

For context, this came up while reviewing rust-lang#77467 (cc `@lcnr).`

Possibly this needs a crater run?

r? `@nikomatsakis`
cc `@matthewjasper`
nielx pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 16, 2021
@Dylan-DPC
Rollup merge of rust-lang#81506 - vo4:hwasan, r=nagisa
58d72ae 
HWAddressSanitizer support

#  Motivation
Compared to regular ASan, HWASan has a [smaller overhead](https://source.android.com/devices/tech/debug/hwasan). The difference in practice is that HWASan'ed code is more usable, e.g. Android device compiled with HWASan can be used as a daily driver.

# Example
```
fn main() {
    let xs = vec![0, 1, 2, 3];
    let _y = unsafe { *xs.as_ptr().offset(4) };
}
```
```
==223==ERROR: HWAddressSanitizer: tag-mismatch on address 0xefdeffff0050 at pc 0xaaaad00b3468
READ of size 4 at 0xefdeffff0050 tags: e5/00 (ptr/mem) in thread T0
    #0 0xaaaad00b3464  (/root/main+0x53464)
    #1 0xaaaad00b39b4  (/root/main+0x539b4)
    #2 0xaaaad00b3dd0  (/root/main+0x53dd0)
    #3 0xaaaad00b61dc  (/root/main+0x561dc)
    #4 0xaaaad00c0574  (/root/main+0x60574)
    #5 0xaaaad00b6290  (/root/main+0x56290)
    #6 0xaaaad00b6170  (/root/main+0x56170)
    #7 0xaaaad00b3578  (/root/main+0x53578)
    #8 0xffff81345e70  (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x20e70)
    #9 0xaaaad0096310  (/root/main+0x36310)

[0xefdeffff0040,0xefdeffff0060) is a small allocated heap chunk; size: 32 offset: 16
0xefdeffff0050 is located 0 bytes to the right of 16-byte region [0xefdeffff0040,0xefdeffff0050)
allocated here:
    #0 0xaaaad009bcdc  (/root/main+0x3bcdc)
    #1 0xaaaad00b1eb0  (/root/main+0x51eb0)
    #2 0xaaaad00b20d4  (/root/main+0x520d4)
    #3 0xaaaad00b2800  (/root/main+0x52800)
    #4 0xaaaad00b1cf4  (/root/main+0x51cf4)
    #5 0xaaaad00b33d4  (/root/main+0x533d4)
    #6 0xaaaad00b39b4  (/root/main+0x539b4)
    #7 0xaaaad00b61dc  (/root/main+0x561dc)
    #8 0xaaaad00b3578  (/root/main+0x53578)
    #9 0xaaaad0096310  (/root/main+0x36310)

Thread: T0 0xeffe00002000 stack: [0xffffc0590000,0xffffc0d90000) sz: 8388608 tls: [0xffff81521020,0xffff815217d0)
Memory tags around the buggy address (one tag corresponds to 16 bytes):
  0xfefcefffef80: 00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00
  0xfefcefffef90: 00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00
  0xfefcefffefa0: 00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00
  0xfefcefffefb0: 00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00
  0xfefcefffefc0: 00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00
  0xfefcefffefd0: 00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00
  0xfefcefffefe0: 00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00
  0xfefcefffeff0: 00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00
=>0xfefceffff000: a2  a2  05  00  e5 [00] 00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00
  0xfefceffff010: 00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00
  0xfefceffff020: 00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00
  0xfefceffff030: 00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00
  0xfefceffff040: 00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00
  0xfefceffff050: 00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00
  0xfefceffff060: 00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00
  0xfefceffff070: 00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00
  0xfefceffff080: 00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00  00
Tags for short granules around the buggy address (one tag corresponds to 16 bytes):
  0xfefcefffeff0: ..  ..  ..  ..  ..  ..  ..  ..  ..  ..  ..  ..  ..  ..  ..  ..
=>0xfefceffff000: ..  ..  c5  ..  .. [..] ..  ..  ..  ..  ..  ..  ..  ..  ..  ..
  0xfefceffff010: ..  ..  ..  ..  ..  ..  ..  ..  ..  ..  ..  ..  ..  ..  ..  ..
See https://clang.llvm.org/docs/HardwareAssistedAddressSanitizerDesign.html#short-granules for a description of short granule tags
Registers where the failure occurred (pc 0xaaaad00b3468):
    x0  e500efdeffff0050  x1  0000000000000004  x2  0000ffffc0d8f5a0  x3  0200efff00000000
    x4  0000ffffc0d8f4c0  x5  000000000000004f  x6  00000ffffc0d8f36  x7  0000efff00000000
    x8  e500efdeffff0050  x9  0200efff00000000  x10 0000000000000000  x11 0200efff00000000
    x12 0200effe000006b0  x13 0200effe000006b0  x14 0000000000000008  x15 00000000c00000cf
    x16 0000aaaad00a0afc  x17 0000000000000003  x18 0000000000000001  x19 0000ffffc0d8f718
    x20 ba00ffffc0d8f7a0  x21 0000aaaad00962e0  x22 0000000000000000  x23 0000000000000000
    x24 0000000000000000  x25 0000000000000000  x26 0000000000000000  x27 0000000000000000
    x28 0000000000000000  x29 0000ffffc0d8f650  x30 0000aaaad00b3468
```

# Comments/Caveats
* HWASan is only supported on arm64.
* I'm not sure if I should add a feature gate or piggyback on the existing one for sanitizers.
* HWASan requires `-C target-feature=+tagged-globals`. That flag should probably be set transparently to the user. Not sure how to go about that.

# TODO
* Need more tests.
* Update documentation.
* Fix symbolization.
* Integrate with CI
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug upstream Tickets that track the upstreaming of patches
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Rust on Haiku 1.29.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@nielx