You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: ISSUE_LIFECYCLE.md
+5-5Lines changed: 5 additions & 5 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ To ensure a balance between work carried out by the NGINX engineering team while
10
10
11
11
3. Determine issue type: This is done with automation where possible, and manually by the owner where necessary. The associated label is applied to the issue.
12
12
#### Possible Issue Types
13
-
`needs-more-info`: The owner should use the issue to request information from the creator. If we don't receive the needed information within 7 days automation closes the issue.
13
+
`needsmoreinfo`: The owner should use the issue to request information from the creator. If we don't receive the needed information within 7 days automation closes the issue.
14
14
15
15
`bug`: The implementation of a feature is not correct.
16
16
@@ -21,17 +21,17 @@ To ensure a balance between work carried out by the NGINX engineering team while
21
21
22
22
4. Determine milestone: The owner, in collaboration with the wider team (PM & engineering), determines what milestone to attach to an issue. Generally, milestones correspond to product releases - however there are two 'magic' milestones with special meanings (not tied to a specific release):
23
23
24
-
- Issues assigned to backlog: Our team is in favour of implementing the feature request/fixing the issue, however the implementation is not yet assigned to a concrete release. If and when a `backlog` issue aligns well with our roadmap, it will be scheduled for a concrete iteration. We review and update our roadmap at least once every quarter. The `backlog` list helps us shape our roadmap, but it is not the only source of input. Therefore, some `backlog` items may eventually be closed as `out-of-scope`, or relabelled as `backlog-candidate` once it becomes clear that they do not align with our evolving roadmap.
24
+
- Issues assigned to backlog: Our team is in favour of implementing the feature request/fixing the issue, however the implementation is not yet assigned to a concrete release. If and when a `backlog` issue aligns well with our roadmap, it will be scheduled for a concrete iteration. We review and update our roadmap at least once every quarter. The `backlog` list helps us shape our roadmap, but it is not the only source of input. Therefore, some `backlog` items may eventually be closed as `out of scope`, or relabelled as `backlog-candidate` once it becomes clear that they do not align with our evolving roadmap.
25
25
26
26
- Issues assigned to `backlog-candidate`: Our team does not intend to implement the feature/fix request described in the issue and wants the community to weigh in before we make our final decision.
27
27
28
-
`backlog` issues can be labeled by the owner as `help-wanted` and/or `good-first-issue` as appropriate.
28
+
`backlog` issues can be labeled by the owner as `helpwanted` and/or `goodfirstissue` as appropriate.
29
29
30
30
31
31
5. Promotion of `backlog-candidate` issue to `backlog` issue: If an issue labelled `backlog-candidate` receives more than 30 upvotes within 60 days, we promote the issue by applying the `backlog` label. While issues promoted in this manner have not been committed to a particular release, we welcome PRs from the community on them.
32
32
33
-
If an issue does not make our roadmap and has not been moved to a discussion, it is closed with the label `out-of-scope`. The goal is to get every issue in the issues list to one of the following end states:
33
+
If an issue does not make our roadmap and has not been moved to a discussion, it is closed with the label `out of scope`. The goal is to get every issue in the issues list to one of the following end states:
0 commit comments