Skip to content

ci(NODE-6879): add binary vector granular benchmarks #787

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 27, 2025

Conversation

nbbeeken
Copy link
Contributor

Description

What is changing?

Add granular benchmarks

Is there new documentation needed for these changes?

What is the motivation for this change?

Vectors are an important path, adding coverage so we can be sensitive to the changes related to them

Double check the following

  • Ran npm run check:lint script
  • Self-review completed using the steps outlined here
  • PR title follows the correct format: type(NODE-xxxx)[!]: description
    • Example: feat(NODE-1234)!: rewriting everything in coffeescript
  • Changes are covered by tests
  • New TODOs have a related JIRA ticket

@nbbeeken nbbeeken requested a review from a team as a code owner March 26, 2025 19:29
@nbbeeken nbbeeken force-pushed the benchmark-bson-vector branch from 3737614 to 4ad41e0 Compare March 26, 2025 19:34
@nbbeeken
Copy link
Contributor Author

@nbbeeken
Copy link
Contributor Author

New tests passing and reporting in

@dariakp dariakp self-assigned this Mar 27, 2025
@dariakp dariakp added the Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes label Mar 27, 2025
@nbbeeken
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dariakp dariakp merged commit 97a21df into main Mar 27, 2025
8 checks passed
@dariakp dariakp deleted the benchmark-bson-vector branch March 27, 2025 21:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants