Defer processing of nested generic calls that return constructor types #54813
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
typescript-bot
added
the
For Uncommitted Bug
|
This PR doesn't have any linked issues. Please open an issue that references this PR. From there we can discuss and prioritise. |
Andarist
force-pushed
the
defer-resolving-generic-functions-that-return-constructors
branch
from
2f8d596 to
8a8b22e
Compare
weswigham
approved these changes
Sep 13, 2023
|
@typescript-bot test this |
|
Heya @weswigham, I've started to run the regular perf test suite on this PR at e0a1e0d. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
|
Heya @weswigham, I've started to run the parallelized Definitely Typed test suite on this PR at e0a1e0d. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
|
Heya @weswigham, I've started to run the diff-based top-repos suite on this PR at e0a1e0d. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
|
@weswigham Here they are:
CompilerComparison Report - baseline..pr
System info unknown
Hosts
Scenarios
tsserverComparison Report - baseline..pr
System info unknown
Hosts
Scenarios
StartupComparison Report - baseline..pr
System info unknown
Hosts
Scenarios
Developer Information: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@weswigham Here are the results of running the top-repos suite comparing Everything looks good! |
|
Hey @weswigham, it looks like the DT test run failed. Please check the log for more details. |
|
@tyescript-bot run dt |
|
@typescript-bot run dt |
|
Heya @sandersn, I've started to run the parallelized Definitely Typed test suite on this PR at fd34565. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
|
Hey @sandersn, the results of running the DT tests are ready. |
Andarist
deleted the
defer-resolving-generic-functions-that-return-constructors
branch
sandersn
added a commit
to sandersn/TypeScript
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 12, 2024
…tor types (microsoft#54813)" This reverts commit 8d1fa44.
This was referenced Mar 12, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm trying a lot of things to benefit from contextual inference like this for nested calls. The only thing that works is if the nested call returns a function but at that position in our library regular functions can also one received.
We need a way between differentiating them at runtime so I tried to return a constructable type from our factories instead - that didn't pan out. It didn't help my inference problems but I was quickly able to find out why... so I tried this as an experiment and since all tests pass, I think it's worth proposing this.