-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
Reuse operandType in checkPrefixUnaryExpression #53682
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
jakebailey
merged 1 commit into
microsoft:main
from
jakebailey:nested-unary-expression-hang
Apr 6, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
11 changes: 11 additions & 0 deletions
11
tests/baselines/reference/nestedUnaryExpressionHang.errors.txt
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ | ||
tests/cases/compiler/nestedUnaryExpressionHang.ts(1,6): error TS2363: The right-hand side of an arithmetic operation must be of type 'any', 'number', 'bigint' or an enum type. | ||
tests/cases/compiler/nestedUnaryExpressionHang.ts(1,34): error TS1109: Expression expected. | ||
|
||
|
||
==== tests/cases/compiler/nestedUnaryExpressionHang.ts (2 errors) ==== | ||
3333%!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | ||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | ||
!!! error TS2363: The right-hand side of an arithmetic operation must be of type 'any', 'number', 'bigint' or an enum type. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This code doesn't parse properly, but, that's the test case that the fuzzer gave me so I feel like it's fine? But, I can try and come up with something that exhibits this problem without errors if desired. |
||
|
||
!!! error TS1109: Expression expected. | ||
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | ||
//// [nestedUnaryExpressionHang.ts] | ||
3333%!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | ||
|
||
|
||
//// [nestedUnaryExpressionHang.js] | ||
3333 % !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!; |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ | ||
=== tests/cases/compiler/nestedUnaryExpressionHang.ts === | ||
|
||
3333%!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | ||
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ | ||
=== tests/cases/compiler/nestedUnaryExpressionHang.ts === | ||
3333%!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | ||
>3333%!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! : number | ||
>3333 : 3333 | ||
>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! : boolean | ||
>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! : boolean | ||
>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! : boolean | ||
>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! : boolean | ||
>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! : boolean | ||
>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! : boolean | ||
>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! : boolean | ||
>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! : boolean | ||
>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! : boolean | ||
>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! : boolean | ||
>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! : boolean | ||
>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! : boolean | ||
>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! : boolean | ||
>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! : boolean | ||
>!!!!!!!!!!!!!! : boolean | ||
>!!!!!!!!!!!!! : boolean | ||
>!!!!!!!!!!!! : boolean | ||
>!!!!!!!!!!! : boolean | ||
>!!!!!!!!!! : boolean | ||
>!!!!!!!!! : boolean | ||
>!!!!!!!! : boolean | ||
>!!!!!!! : boolean | ||
>!!!!!! : boolean | ||
>!!!!! : boolean | ||
>!!!! : boolean | ||
>!!! : boolean | ||
>!! : boolean | ||
>! : boolean | ||
|
||
> : any | ||
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
3333%!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This direct call to
checkTruthinessOfType
when the operand type is known mirrors our handling of binary expressions inonOperator
.I checked all other call sites, and only this one benefits from not reevaluating the type (which is good, unless we wanted to find more of these for even more perf!).