-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
Widen widening literal types through compound-like assignments #52493
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
d18dc2c
to
9636938
Compare
# Conflicts: # src/compiler/checker.ts
fc11bcc
to
f5a1144
Compare
f5a1144
to
e09ec95
Compare
@rbuckton @jakebailey would you mind taking another look at this? CI is currently failing here for unrelated reasons (see #54791 ) |
@typescript-bot test this |
Heya @jakebailey, I've started to run the parallelized Definitely Typed test suite on this PR at d110f3c. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Heya @jakebailey, I've started to run the diff-based top-repos suite on this PR at d110f3c. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Heya @jakebailey, I've started to run the abridged perf test suite on this PR at d110f3c. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Heya @jakebailey, I've started to run the diff-based user code test suite on this PR at d110f3c. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Heya @jakebailey, I've started to run the extended test suite on this PR at d110f3c. You can monitor the build here. |
Heya @jakebailey, I've started to run the tarball bundle task on this PR at d110f3c. You can monitor the build here. |
Hey @jakebailey, I've packed this into an installable tgz. You can install it for testing by referencing it in your
and then running There is also a playground for this build and an npm module you can use via |
@jakebailey Here they are:Comparison Report - main..52493
System
Hosts
Scenarios
Developer Information: |
@jakebailey Here are the results of running the user test suite comparing There were infrastructure failures potentially unrelated to your change:
Otherwise... Something interesting changed - please have a look. Details
|
@jakebailey Here are the results of running the top-repos suite comparing Everything looks good! |
Hey @jakebailey, it looks like the DT test run failed. Please check the log for more details. |
@typescript-bot test top100 |
Well, I guess I'll just wait :( |
Heya @jakebailey, I've started to run the tsc-only perf test suite on this PR at b19223c. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Heya @jakebailey, I've started to run the diff-based top-repos suite on this PR at b19223c. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Heya @jakebailey, I've started to run the parallelized Definitely Typed test suite on this PR at b19223c. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
Heya @jakebailey, I've started to run the diff-based user code test suite on this PR at b19223c. You can monitor the build here. Update: The results are in! |
@jakebailey Here they are:
CompilerComparison Report - baseline..pr
System info unknown
Hosts
Scenarios
Developer Information: |
@jakebailey Here are the results of running the user test suite comparing There were infrastructure failures potentially unrelated to your change:
Otherwise... Something interesting changed - please have a look. Details
|
@jakebailey Here are the results of running the top-repos suite comparing Everything looks good! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems good to me now; is there anything left here?
Nothing that I would be aware of :) |
Hey @jakebailey, the results of running the DT tests are ready. |
fixes #13865