Closed
Description
π Search Terms
static private fields methods accessors
β Viability Checklist
My suggestion meets these guidelines:
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, new syntax sugar for JS, etc.)
- This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.
β Suggestion
Add support for static private class elements (fields/methods/accessors). The proposal for adding these in EcmaScript has reached Stage 3. (proposal-static-class-features)
π Motivating Example
class ColorFinder {
static #red = "#ff0000";
static #green = "#00ff00";
static #blue = "#0000ff";
static colorName(name) {
switch (name) {
case "red": return ColorFinder.#red;
case "blue": return ColorFinder.#blue;
case "green": return ColorFinder.#green;
default: throw new RangeError("unknown color");
}
}
}