-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[clang][OpenMP] Fix region nesting check for scan
directive
#98386
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
The previous check was inconsistent. For example, it would allow ``` #pragma omp target #pragma omp parallel for for (...) { #pragma omp scan } ``` but not ``` #pragma omp target parallel for for (...) { #pragma omp scan } ``` Make the check conform to the wording on the specification.
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Krzysztof Parzyszek (kparzysz) ChangesThe previous check was inconsistent. For example, it would allow
but not
Make the check conform to the wording on the specification. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98386.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp
index bc5c172f1390e..ef09e53077f47 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp
@@ -4989,14 +4989,19 @@ static bool checkNestingOfRegions(Sema &SemaRef, const DSAStackTy *Stack,
OrphanSeen = ParentRegion == OMPD_unknown;
Recommend = ShouldBeInTargetRegion;
} else if (CurrentRegion == OMPD_scan) {
- // OpenMP [2.16, Nesting of Regions]
- // If specified, a teams construct must be contained within a target
- // construct.
- NestingProhibited =
- SemaRef.LangOpts.OpenMP < 50 ||
- (ParentRegion != OMPD_simd && ParentRegion != OMPD_for &&
- ParentRegion != OMPD_for_simd && ParentRegion != OMPD_parallel_for &&
- ParentRegion != OMPD_parallel_for_simd);
+ if (SemaRef.LangOpts.OpenMP >= 50) {
+ SmallVector<OpenMPDirectiveKind, 4> LeafOrComposite;
+ std::ignore = getLeafOrCompositeConstructs(ParentRegion, LeafOrComposite);
+ // OpenMP spec 5.0 and 5.1 require scan to be directly enclosed by for,
+ // simd, or for simd. This has to take into account combined directives.
+ // In 5.2 this seems to be implied by the fact that the specified
+ // separated constructs are do, for, and simd.
+ OpenMPDirectiveKind Enclosing = LeafOrComposite.back();
+ NestingProhibited = Enclosing != OMPD_for && Enclosing != OMPD_simd &&
+ Enclosing != OMPD_for_simd;
+ } else {
+ NestingProhibited = true;
+ }
OrphanSeen = ParentRegion == OMPD_unknown;
Recommend = ShouldBeInLoopSimdRegion;
}
diff --git a/clang/test/OpenMP/Inputs/nesting_of_regions.cpp b/clang/test/OpenMP/Inputs/nesting_of_regions.cpp
index 969ddfcce4cb0..985cdc0e19adc 100644
--- a/clang/test/OpenMP/Inputs/nesting_of_regions.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/OpenMP/Inputs/nesting_of_regions.cpp
@@ -5346,11 +5346,6 @@ void foo() {
}
#pragma omp target parallel for
for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
-#pragma omp scan // expected-error {{region cannot be closely nested inside 'target parallel for' region}}
- bar();
- }
-#pragma omp target parallel for
- for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
#pragma omp taskwait
bar();
}
@@ -7146,7 +7141,7 @@ void foo() {
}
#pragma omp target simd
for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
-#pragma omp scan // omp45-error {{OpenMP constructs may not be nested inside a simd region}} omp50-error {{region cannot be closely nested inside 'target simd' region; perhaps you forget to enclose 'omp scan' directive into a for, simd, for simd, parallel for, or parallel for simd region?}} omp51-error {{region cannot be closely nested inside 'target simd' region; perhaps you forget to enclose 'omp scan' directive into a for, simd, for simd, parallel for, or parallel for simd region?}}
+#pragma omp scan // omp45-error {{OpenMP constructs may not be nested inside a simd region}} omp50-error {{exactly one of 'inclusive' or 'exclusive' clauses is expected}} omp51-error {{exactly one of 'inclusive' or 'exclusive' clauses is expected}}
bar();
}
#pragma omp target simd
@@ -14583,11 +14578,6 @@ void foo() {
}
#pragma omp target parallel for
for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
-#pragma omp scan // expected-error {{region cannot be closely nested inside 'target parallel for' region}}
- bar();
- }
-#pragma omp target parallel for
- for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
#pragma omp taskwait
bar();
}
@@ -16685,7 +16675,7 @@ void foo() {
}
#pragma omp target simd
for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
-#pragma omp scan // omp45-error {{OpenMP constructs may not be nested inside a simd region}} omp50-error {{region cannot be closely nested inside 'target simd' region; perhaps you forget to enclose 'omp scan' directive into a for, simd, for simd, parallel for, or parallel for simd region?}} omp51-error {{region cannot be closely nested inside 'target simd' region; perhaps you forget to enclose 'omp scan' directive into a for, simd, for simd, parallel for, or parallel for simd region?}}
+#pragma omp scan // omp45-error {{OpenMP constructs may not be nested inside a simd region}} omp50-error {{exactly one of 'inclusive' or 'exclusive' clauses is expected}} omp51-error {{exactly one of 'inclusive' or 'exclusive' clauses is expected}}
bar();
}
#pragma omp target simd
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LG
…8386) The previous check was inconsistent. For example, it would allow ``` #pragma omp target #pragma omp parallel for for (...) { #pragma omp scan } ``` but not ``` #pragma omp target parallel for for (...) { #pragma omp scan } ``` Make the check conform to the wording on the specification.
The previous check was inconsistent. For example, it would allow
but not
Make the check conform to the wording on the specification.