-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.6k
[mlir][Pass] Handle escaped pipline option values #97667
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[mlir][Pass] Handle escaped pipline option values #97667
Conversation
The PassRegistry parser properly handles escape tokens (', ", {}) when parsing pass options from string but then does not strip the escape tokens when providing the values back to the caller. This change updates the parser such that escape tokens are properly removed and whitespace is trimmed when extracting option values.
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project! This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page. If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide. You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums. |
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir-core @llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir Author: Nikhil Kalra (nikalra) ChangesThe PassRegistry parser properly handles escape tokens (', ", {}) when parsing pass options from string but then does not strip the escape tokens when providing the values back to the caller. This change updates the parser such that escape tokens are properly removed and whitespace is trimmed when extracting option values. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97667.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/mlir/lib/Pass/PassRegistry.cpp b/mlir/lib/Pass/PassRegistry.cpp
index f8149673a4093..483cbe80faba6 100644
--- a/mlir/lib/Pass/PassRegistry.cpp
+++ b/mlir/lib/Pass/PassRegistry.cpp
@@ -218,6 +218,20 @@ parseNextArg(StringRef options) {
auto extractArgAndUpdateOptions = [&](size_t argSize) {
StringRef str = options.take_front(argSize).trim();
options = options.drop_front(argSize).ltrim();
+ // Handle escape sequences
+ if (str.size() > 2) {
+ const auto escapePairs = {std::make_pair('\'', '\''),
+ std::make_pair('"', '"'),
+ std::make_pair('{', '}')};
+ for (const auto &escape : escapePairs) {
+ if (str.front() == escape.first && str.back() == escape.second) {
+ // Drop the escape characters and trim.
+ str = str.drop_front().drop_back().trim();
+ // Don't process additional escape sequences.
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
return str;
};
// Try to process the given punctuation, properly escaping any contained
diff --git a/mlir/test/Pass/pipeline-options-parsing.mlir b/mlir/test/Pass/pipeline-options-parsing.mlir
index 34313cd556603..8b71039180ac5 100644
--- a/mlir/test/Pass/pipeline-options-parsing.mlir
+++ b/mlir/test/Pass/pipeline-options-parsing.mlir
@@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
// RUN: mlir-opt %s -verify-each=false -pass-pipeline='builtin.module(func.func(test-options-pass{string-list=a list=1,2,3,4 string-list=b,c list=5 string-list=d string=nested_pipeline{arg1=10 arg2=" {} " arg3=true}}))' -dump-pass-pipeline 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK_1 %s
// RUN: mlir-opt %s -verify-each=false -test-options-pass-pipeline='list=1 string-list=a,b enum=one' -dump-pass-pipeline 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK_2 %s
// RUN: mlir-opt %s -verify-each=false -pass-pipeline='builtin.module(builtin.module(func.func(test-options-pass{list=3}), func.func(test-options-pass{enum=one list=1,2,3,4})))' -dump-pass-pipeline 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK_3 %s
+// RUN: mlir-opt %s -verify-each=false -pass-pipeline='builtin.module(builtin.module(func.func(test-options-pass{list=3}), func.func(test-options-pass{enum=one list=1,2,3,4 string="foobarbaz"})))' -dump-pass-pipeline 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK_4 %s
+// RUN: mlir-opt %s -verify-each=false -pass-pipeline='builtin.module(builtin.module(func.func(test-options-pass{list=3}), func.func(test-options-pass{enum=one list=1,2,3,4 string={foobarbaz}})))' -dump-pass-pipeline 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK_4 %s
// CHECK_ERROR_1: missing closing '}' while processing pass options
// CHECK_ERROR_2: no such option test-option
@@ -17,3 +19,4 @@
// CHECK_1: test-options-pass{enum=zero list=1,2,3,4,5 string=nested_pipeline{arg1=10 arg2=" {} " arg3=true} string-list=a,b,c,d}
// CHECK_2: test-options-pass{enum=one list=1 string= string-list=a,b}
// CHECK_3: builtin.module(builtin.module(func.func(test-options-pass{enum=zero list=3 string= }),func.func(test-options-pass{enum=one list=1,2,3,4 string= })))
+// CHECK_4: builtin.module(builtin.module(func.func(test-options-pass{enum=zero list=3 string= }),func.func(test-options-pass{enum=one list=1,2,3,4 string=foobarbaz })))
|
const size_t escapeIndex = | ||
std::min({str.find_first_of('{'), str.find_first_of('\''), | ||
str.find_first_of('"')}); | ||
const bool requiresEscape = spaceIndex < escapeIndex; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What happens if the string has no space but contains "
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that should still be ok since the parser just looks for
or the corresponding end terminator (if the first character after =
is an escape character) to extract the argument. For example:
❯ mlir-opt mlir/test/Pass/pipeline-options-parsing.mlir -verify-each=false -pass-pipeline='builtin.module(builtin.module(func.func(test-options-pass{list=3}), func.func(test-options-pass{enum=one list=1,2,3,4 string=foo"bar"baz})))' -dump-pass-pipeline
Pass Manager with 1 passes:
builtin.module(builtin.module(func.func(test-options-pass{enum=zero list=3 string= }),func.func(test-options-pass{enum=one list=1,2,3,4 string=foo"bar"baz })))
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added another test to verify!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
@nikalra Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the LLVM Project! Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then tested Please check whether problems have been caused by your change specifically, as How to do this, and the rest of the post-merge process, is covered in detail here. If your change does cause a problem, it may be reverted, or you can revert it yourself. If you don't get any reports, no action is required from you. Your changes are working as expected, well done! |
The PassRegistry parser properly handles escape tokens (', ", {}) when parsing pass options from string but then does not strip the escape tokens when providing the values back to the caller. This change updates the parser such that escape tokens are properly removed and whitespace is trimmed when extracting option values.
The PassRegistry parser properly handles escape tokens (', ", {}) when parsing pass options from string but then does not strip the escape tokens when providing the values back to the caller.
This change updates the parser such that escape tokens are properly removed and whitespace is trimmed when extracting option values.