-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.6k
[libc++][format] Fixes nested concept evaluation. #85548
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[libc++][format] Fixes nested concept evaluation. #85548
Conversation
@llvm/pr-subscribers-libcxx Author: Mark de Wever (mordante) ChangesBefore the __formattable concept depended on itself in a contrieved example. By using the underlying concept directly the cycle is broken. Fixes #81590 Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85548.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/libcxx/include/__format/format_arg_store.h b/libcxx/include/__format/format_arg_store.h
index 066cd369eb8918..23a599e9957599 100644
--- a/libcxx/include/__format/format_arg_store.h
+++ b/libcxx/include/__format/format_arg_store.h
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ consteval __arg_t __determine_arg_t() {
// The overload for not formattable types allows triggering the static
// assertion below.
template <class _Context, class _Tp>
- requires(!__formattable<_Tp, typename _Context::char_type>)
+ requires(!__formattable_with<_Tp, _Context>)
consteval __arg_t __determine_arg_t() {
return __arg_t::__none;
}
@@ -165,7 +165,6 @@ _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI basic_format_arg<_Context> __create_format_arg(_Tp& __valu
using _Dp = remove_const_t<_Tp>;
constexpr __arg_t __arg = __determine_arg_t<_Context, _Dp>();
static_assert(__arg != __arg_t::__none, "the supplied type is not formattable");
-
static_assert(__formattable_with<_Tp, _Context>);
// Not all types can be used to directly initialize the
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/format/format.functions/bug_81590.compile.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/format/format.functions/bug_81590.compile.pass.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..0969d3bc21dfad
--- /dev/null
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/format/format.functions/bug_81590.compile.pass.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+// UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11, c++14, c++17
+// UNSUPPORTED: GCC-ALWAYS_INLINE-FIXME
+
+// The sample code is based on the bug report
+// https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/81590
+//
+// Tests whether this formatter does not fail to compile due to nested concept
+// evaluation.
+
+#include <format>
+#include <variant>
+
+struct X : std::variant<X*> {
+ X* p = nullptr;
+ constexpr const std::variant<X*>& decay() const noexcept { return *this; }
+};
+
+template <>
+struct std::formatter<X, char> : std::formatter<std::string, char> {
+ static constexpr auto format(const X& x, auto ctx) {
+ if (!x.p)
+ return ctx.out();
+ auto m = [&](const X* t) { return std::format_to(ctx.out(), "{}", *t); };
+ return std::visit(m, x.decay());
+ }
+};
+
+void bug_81590() { (void)std::format("{}", X{}); }
|
683f837
to
a80c9a0
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM with minor comment.
libcxx/test/std/utilities/format/format.functions/bug_81590.compile.pass.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Before the __formattable concept depended on itself in a contrieved example. By using the underlying concept directly the cycle is broken. Fixes llvm#81590
a80c9a0
to
e3049c4
Compare
Before the __formattable concept depended on itself in a contrieved example. By using the underlying concept directly the cycle is broken. Fixes llvm#81590
Before the __formattable concept depended on itself in a contrieved example. By using the underlying concept directly the cycle is broken.
Fixes #81590