-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.5k
[libc] fix -Wshift-count-overflow in UInt.h #74649
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[libc] fix -Wshift-count-overflow in UInt.h #74649
Conversation
Not that I'm very good at SFINAE, but it seems that conversion operators are perhaps difficult to compose with SFINAE. I saw an example that used one layer of indirection to have an explicit return type that could then be used with enable_if_t. Link: https://stackoverflow.com/a/7604580 Fixes: llvm#74623
@llvm/pr-subscribers-libc Author: Nick Desaulniers (nickdesaulniers) ChangesNot that I'm very good at SFINAE, but it seems that conversion operators are Link: https://stackoverflow.com/a/7604580 Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74649.diff 1 Files Affected:
diff --git a/libc/src/__support/UInt.h b/libc/src/__support/UInt.h
index 3bec2e3a47130..f72b995f8788d 100644
--- a/libc/src/__support/UInt.h
+++ b/libc/src/__support/UInt.h
@@ -103,13 +103,20 @@ template <size_t Bits, bool Signed> struct BigInt {
val[i] = words[i];
}
- template <typename T, typename = cpp::enable_if_t<cpp::is_integral_v<T> &&
- sizeof(T) <= 16 &&
- !cpp::is_same_v<T, bool>>>
- LIBC_INLINE constexpr explicit operator T() const {
- if constexpr (sizeof(T) <= 8)
- return static_cast<T>(val[0]);
+ template <typename T> LIBC_INLINE constexpr explicit operator T() const {
+ return to<T>();
+ }
+ template <typename T>
+ LIBC_INLINE constexpr cpp::enable_if_t<
+ cpp::is_integral_v<T> && sizeof(T) <= 8 && !cpp::is_same_v<T, bool>, T>
+ to() const {
+ return static_cast<T>(val[0]);
+ }
+ template <typename T>
+ LIBC_INLINE constexpr cpp::enable_if_t<
+ cpp::is_integral_v<T> && sizeof(T) == 16, T>
+ to() const {
// T is 128-bit.
T lo = static_cast<T>(val[0]);
@@ -121,7 +128,6 @@ template <size_t Bits, bool Signed> struct BigInt {
return lo;
}
} else {
- // TODO: silence shift warning
return static_cast<T>((static_cast<T>(val[1]) << 64) + lo);
}
}
|
LIBC_INLINE constexpr explicit operator T() const { | ||
if constexpr (sizeof(T) <= 8) | ||
return static_cast<T>(val[0]); | ||
template <typename T> LIBC_INLINE constexpr explicit operator T() const { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
does this template need any sort of limit (e.g. enable_if_t<is_integral_v<T>>
)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We don't need extra guard here, since it is already guarded with to<T>()
templates.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah, if it doesn't fail here it will fail there. I don't feel strongly either way, so merging for now. If you feel strongly otherwise I'll send another patch to add that.
Not that I'm very good at SFINAE, but it seems that conversion operators are
perhaps difficult to compose with SFINAE. I saw an example that used one layer
of indirection to have an explicit return type that could then be used with
enable_if_t.
Link: https://stackoverflow.com/a/7604580
Fixes: #74623