Skip to content

[sanitizer] Change return type of __sanitizer_symbolize_demangle to bool #65991

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 11, 2023

Conversation

vitalybuka
Copy link
Collaborator

To match other internal symbolizer functions.

This makes harder to distighush small buffer from a different failure,
but we has the same problem for the rest of the lib.

Still we use 16k buffer so it should be enough most of the time.
We can fix all function togerher if future, if needed.

To match other internal symbolizer functions.

This makes harder to distighush small buffer from a different failure,
but we has the same problem for the rest of the lib.

Still we use 16k buffer so it should be enough most of the time.
We can fix all function togerher if future, if needed.
@vitalybuka vitalybuka merged commit 4ee7cf7 into llvm:main Sep 11, 2023
AntonRydahl pushed a commit to AntonRydahl/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2023
…ool (llvm#65991)

To match other internal symbolizer functions.

This makes harder to distighush small buffer from a different failure,
but we has the same problem for the rest of the lib.

Still we use 16k buffer so it should be enough most of the time.
We can fix all function togerher if future, if needed.
ZijunZhaoCCK pushed a commit to ZijunZhaoCCK/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2023
…ool (llvm#65991)

To match other internal symbolizer functions.

This makes harder to distighush small buffer from a different failure,
but we has the same problem for the rest of the lib.

Still we use 16k buffer so it should be enough most of the time.
We can fix all function togerher if future, if needed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants