Skip to content

[clang-linker-wrapper][lit] Fix SPIR-V ELF test when spirv-tools feature is available #126756

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 11, 2025

Conversation

sarnex
Copy link
Member

@sarnex sarnex commented Feb 11, 2025

My last change made the test not run when the spirv-tools feature is not available, which is always the case in CI for clang tests, but it fails if spirv-tools is available for the following reasons:

  1. We didn't build spirv-link as part of the internal SPIRV-Tools build, which is required by the clang call in clang-linker-wrapper, I already fixed that here.
  2. We didn't depend on the SPIRV-Tools CMake targets in clang tests, so depending on what CMake targets were built before running check-clang, SPIRV-Tools might not have been built.
  3. We didn't check for llvm-spirv being available, which is not part of SPIRV-Tools but is currently required for SPIR-V compilation.

Manually confirmed this works. This test is the bane of my existence.

Signed-off-by: Sarnie, Nick <[email protected]>
@sarnex sarnex marked this pull request as ready for review February 11, 2025 19:52
@llvmbot llvmbot added the clang Clang issues not falling into any other category label Feb 11, 2025
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Feb 11, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: Nick Sarnie (sarnex)

Changes

My last change made the test not run when the spirv-tools feature is not available, which is always the case in CI for clang tests, but it fails if spirv-tools is available for the following reasons:

  1. We didn't build spirv-link as part of the internal SPIRV-Tools build, which is required by the clang call in clang-linker-wrapper, I already fixed that here.
  2. We didn't depend on the SPIRV-Tools CMake targets in clang tests, so depending on what CMake targets were built before running check-clang, SPIRV-Tools might not have been built.
  3. We didn't check for llvm-spirv being available, which is not part of SPIRV-Tools but is currently required for SPIR-V compilation.

Manually confirmed this works. This test is the bane of my existence.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126756.diff

3 Files Affected:

  • (modified) clang/test/CMakeLists.txt (+9)
  • (modified) clang/test/Tooling/clang-linker-wrapper-spirv-elf.cpp (+1)
  • (modified) clang/test/Tooling/lit.local.cfg (+6)
diff --git a/clang/test/CMakeLists.txt b/clang/test/CMakeLists.txt
index e9eb54a67204c..b796a51ef600e 100644
--- a/clang/test/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/clang/test/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -103,6 +103,15 @@ if(CLANG_BUILD_EXAMPLES AND CLANG_PLUGIN_SUPPORT)
     )
 endif ()
 
+if(LLVM_INCLUDE_SPIRV_TOOLS_TESTS)
+  list(APPEND CLANG_TEST_DEPS
+    spirv-dis
+    spirv-val
+    spirv-as
+    spirv-link
+    )
+endif()    
+
 set(CLANG_TEST_PARAMS
   USE_Z3_SOLVER=0
   )
diff --git a/clang/test/Tooling/clang-linker-wrapper-spirv-elf.cpp b/clang/test/Tooling/clang-linker-wrapper-spirv-elf.cpp
index 4f8658064e857..9b16727d74192 100644
--- a/clang/test/Tooling/clang-linker-wrapper-spirv-elf.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/Tooling/clang-linker-wrapper-spirv-elf.cpp
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 // Verify the ELF packaging of OpenMP SPIR-V device images.
 // REQUIRES: system-linux
 // REQUIRES: spirv-tools
+// REQUIRES: llvm-spirv
 // RUN: mkdir -p %t_tmp
 // RUN: cd %t_tmp
 // RUN: %clangxx -fopenmp -fopenmp-targets=spirv64-intel -nogpulib -c -o %t_clang-linker-wrapper-spirv-elf.o %s
diff --git a/clang/test/Tooling/lit.local.cfg b/clang/test/Tooling/lit.local.cfg
index bc2a096c8f64f..61f328c91e4d3 100644
--- a/clang/test/Tooling/lit.local.cfg
+++ b/clang/test/Tooling/lit.local.cfg
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+import lit.util
+
 if not config.root.clang_staticanalyzer:
     config.unsupported = True
 
@@ -6,3 +8,7 @@ if config.spirv_tools_tests:
     config.substitutions.append(("spirv-dis", os.path.join(config.llvm_tools_dir, "spirv-dis")))
     config.substitutions.append(("spirv-val", os.path.join(config.llvm_tools_dir, "spirv-val")))
     config.substitutions.append(("spirv-as", os.path.join(config.llvm_tools_dir, "spirv-as")))
+    config.substitutions.append(("spirv-link", os.path.join(config.llvm_tools_dir, "spirv-link")))
+
+if lit.util.which("llvm-spirv"):
+    config.available_features.add("llvm-spirv")

@sarnex sarnex requested a review from jhuber6 February 11, 2025 19:53
Copy link
Contributor

@jhuber6 jhuber6 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We've all been there

@sarnex sarnex merged commit c2fea0d into llvm:main Feb 11, 2025
11 checks passed
Icohedron pushed a commit to Icohedron/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2025
…ure is available (llvm#126756)

My last change made the test not run when the `spirv-tools` feature is
not available, which is always the case in CI for clang tests, but it
fails if `spirv-tools` is available for the following reasons:
1) We didn't build `spirv-link` as part of the internal `SPIRV-Tools`
build, which is required by the `clang` call in `clang-linker-wrapper`,
I already fixed that
[here](llvm#126319).
2) We didn't depend on the `SPIRV-Tools` CMake targets in clang tests,
so depending on what CMake targets were built before running
`check-clang`, `SPIRV-Tools` might not have been built.
3) We didn't check for `llvm-spirv` being available, which is not part
of `SPIRV-Tools` but is currently required for SPIR-V compilation.

Manually confirmed this works. This test is the bane of my existence.

---------

Signed-off-by: Sarnie, Nick <[email protected]>
flovent pushed a commit to flovent/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2025
…ure is available (llvm#126756)

My last change made the test not run when the `spirv-tools` feature is
not available, which is always the case in CI for clang tests, but it
fails if `spirv-tools` is available for the following reasons:
1) We didn't build `spirv-link` as part of the internal `SPIRV-Tools`
build, which is required by the `clang` call in `clang-linker-wrapper`,
I already fixed that
[here](llvm#126319).
2) We didn't depend on the `SPIRV-Tools` CMake targets in clang tests,
so depending on what CMake targets were built before running
`check-clang`, `SPIRV-Tools` might not have been built.
3) We didn't check for `llvm-spirv` being available, which is not part
of `SPIRV-Tools` but is currently required for SPIR-V compilation.

Manually confirmed this works. This test is the bane of my existence.

---------

Signed-off-by: Sarnie, Nick <[email protected]>
joaosaffran pushed a commit to joaosaffran/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2025
…ure is available (llvm#126756)

My last change made the test not run when the `spirv-tools` feature is
not available, which is always the case in CI for clang tests, but it
fails if `spirv-tools` is available for the following reasons:
1) We didn't build `spirv-link` as part of the internal `SPIRV-Tools`
build, which is required by the `clang` call in `clang-linker-wrapper`,
I already fixed that
[here](llvm#126319).
2) We didn't depend on the `SPIRV-Tools` CMake targets in clang tests,
so depending on what CMake targets were built before running
`check-clang`, `SPIRV-Tools` might not have been built.
3) We didn't check for `llvm-spirv` being available, which is not part
of `SPIRV-Tools` but is currently required for SPIR-V compilation.

Manually confirmed this works. This test is the bane of my existence.

---------

Signed-off-by: Sarnie, Nick <[email protected]>
sivan-shani pushed a commit to sivan-shani/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2025
…ure is available (llvm#126756)

My last change made the test not run when the `spirv-tools` feature is
not available, which is always the case in CI for clang tests, but it
fails if `spirv-tools` is available for the following reasons:
1) We didn't build `spirv-link` as part of the internal `SPIRV-Tools`
build, which is required by the `clang` call in `clang-linker-wrapper`,
I already fixed that
[here](llvm#126319).
2) We didn't depend on the `SPIRV-Tools` CMake targets in clang tests,
so depending on what CMake targets were built before running
`check-clang`, `SPIRV-Tools` might not have been built.
3) We didn't check for `llvm-spirv` being available, which is not part
of `SPIRV-Tools` but is currently required for SPIR-V compilation.

Manually confirmed this works. This test is the bane of my existence.

---------

Signed-off-by: Sarnie, Nick <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
clang Clang issues not falling into any other category
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants