Skip to content

[rtsan] Remove std::variant from rtsan diagnostics #109786

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 24, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions compiler-rt/lib/rtsan/rtsan.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -87,7 +87,8 @@ __rtsan_notify_intercepted_call(const char *func_name) {
GET_CALLER_PC_BP;
ExpectNotRealtime(
GetContextForThisThread(),
PrintDiagnosticsAndDieAction({InterceptedCallInfo{func_name}, pc, bp}));
PrintDiagnosticsAndDieAction(
{DiagnosticsInfoType::InterceptedCall, func_name, pc, bp}));
}

SANITIZER_INTERFACE_ATTRIBUTE void
Expand All @@ -96,7 +97,8 @@ __rtsan_notify_blocking_call(const char *func_name) {
GET_CALLER_PC_BP;
ExpectNotRealtime(
GetContextForThisThread(),
PrintDiagnosticsAndDieAction({BlockingCallInfo{func_name}, pc, bp}));
PrintDiagnosticsAndDieAction(
{DiagnosticsInfoType::BlockingCall, func_name, pc, bp}));
}

} // extern "C"
58 changes: 28 additions & 30 deletions compiler-rt/lib/rtsan/rtsan_diagnostics.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -37,12 +37,6 @@ class Decorator : public __sanitizer::SanitizerCommonDecorator {
const char *FunctionName() const { return Green(); }
const char *Reason() const { return Blue(); }
};

template <class... Ts> struct Overloaded : Ts... {
using Ts::operator()...;
};
// TODO: Remove below when c++20
template <class... Ts> Overloaded(Ts...) -> Overloaded<Ts...>;
} // namespace

static void PrintStackTrace(uptr pc, uptr bp) {
Expand All @@ -53,35 +47,39 @@ static void PrintStackTrace(uptr pc, uptr bp) {
}

static void PrintError(const Decorator &decorator,
const DiagnosticsCallerInfo &info) {
const char *violation_type = std::visit(
Overloaded{
[](const InterceptedCallInfo &) { return "unsafe-library-call"; },
[](const BlockingCallInfo &) { return "blocking-call"; }},
info);
const DiagnosticsInfo &info) {
const auto ErrorTypeStr = [&info]() -> const char * {
switch (info.type) {
case DiagnosticsInfoType::InterceptedCall:
return "unsafe-library-call";
case DiagnosticsInfoType::BlockingCall:
return "blocking-call";
}
return "(unknown error)";
};

Printf("%s", decorator.Error());
Report("ERROR: RealtimeSanitizer: %s\n", violation_type);
Report("ERROR: RealtimeSanitizer: %s\n", ErrorTypeStr());
}

static void PrintReason(const Decorator &decorator,
const DiagnosticsCallerInfo &info) {
const DiagnosticsInfo &info) {
Printf("%s", decorator.Reason());

std::visit(
Overloaded{[decorator](const InterceptedCallInfo &call) {
Printf("Intercepted call to real-time unsafe function "
"`%s%s%s` in real-time context!",
decorator.FunctionName(),
call.intercepted_function_name_, decorator.Reason());
},
[decorator](const BlockingCallInfo &arg) {
Printf("Call to blocking function "
"`%s%s%s` in real-time context!",
decorator.FunctionName(), arg.blocking_function_name_,
decorator.Reason());
}},
info);
switch (info.type) {
case DiagnosticsInfoType::InterceptedCall: {
Printf("Intercepted call to real-time unsafe function "
"`%s%s%s` in real-time context!",
decorator.FunctionName(), info.func_name, decorator.Reason());
break;
}
case DiagnosticsInfoType::BlockingCall: {
Printf("Call to blocking function "
"`%s%s%s` in real-time context!",
decorator.FunctionName(), info.func_name, decorator.Reason());
break;
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

@cjappl cjappl Sep 24, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Strange styling here, but I presume it is what clang-format spit out. (the white space being not indented here

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yup, this is clang-format's IndentCaseLabels option at work - I've seen it as false more often than not on the codebases I've worked on, but I get it's a bit odd if you're used to indented cases


Printf("\n");
}
Expand All @@ -90,8 +88,8 @@ void __rtsan::PrintDiagnostics(const DiagnosticsInfo &info) {
ScopedErrorReportLock l;

Decorator d;
PrintError(d, info.call_info);
PrintReason(d, info.call_info);
PrintError(d, info);
PrintReason(d, info);
Printf("%s", d.Default());
PrintStackTrace(info.pc, info.bp);
}
19 changes: 5 additions & 14 deletions compiler-rt/lib/rtsan/rtsan_diagnostics.h
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -15,25 +15,16 @@
#include "sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common.h"
#include "sanitizer_common/sanitizer_internal_defs.h"

#include <variant>

namespace __rtsan {

struct InterceptedCallInfo {
const char *intercepted_function_name_;
};

struct BlockingCallInfo {
public:
const char *blocking_function_name_;
enum class DiagnosticsInfoType {
InterceptedCall,
BlockingCall,
};

using DiagnosticsCallerInfo =
std::variant<InterceptedCallInfo, BlockingCallInfo>;

struct DiagnosticsInfo {
DiagnosticsCallerInfo call_info;

DiagnosticsInfoType type;
const char *func_name;
__sanitizer::uptr pc;
__sanitizer::uptr bp;
};
Expand Down
Loading