-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.5k
Reapply "[Clang][Sema] Use the correct lookup context when building overloaded 'operator->' in the current instantiation (#104458)" #109422
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
sdkrystian
merged 12 commits into
llvm:main
from
sdkrystian:reapply-fix-overloaded-arrow
Jan 22, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6edb145
Reapply "[Clang][Sema] Use the correct lookup context when building o…
sdkrystian a4ad2b9
[FOLD] fix destructor lookup when the object expression is dependent
sdkrystian 0380314
[FOLD] use IsDependent output parameter
sdkrystian 772a6c0
[FOLD] don't use getAsRecordDecl
sdkrystian 51a3384
[FOLD] fix capitalization
sdkrystian e3326ab
[FOLD] fix dependent overloaded arrow
sdkrystian 764a9a8
[FOLD] cleanup
sdkrystian 30297f7
[FOLD] add test
sdkrystian dead49d
[FOLD] fix dependence check
sdkrystian 10ba129
[FOLD] address review feedback
sdkrystian 039fbbc
[FOLD] revert assert condition
sdkrystian 7d0ac98
[FOLD] cleanup
sdkrystian File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is unfortunate, it looks like we're having this problem diagnosing in both phases here, and can get worse with partial instantiations. Typically we'd want to solve this by replacing the expression with a RecoveryExpr or something to suppress it in the instantiated version, can you look into something like that?