lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Linux/NativeRegisterContextLinux_arm.cpp:509: Pointless test ? #91223
Labels
Comments
|
@llvm/issue-subscribers-lldb Author: None (dcb314)
Static analyser cppcheck says:
lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Linux/NativeRegisterContextLinux_arm.cpp:509:25: style: Expression is always true because 'else if' condition is opposite to previous condition at line 505. [multiCondition] Source code is if (watch_mask > 0x04) |
xgupta
added a commit
to xgupta/llvm-project
that referenced
this issue
Jun 8, 2024
This issue is reported by cppcheck as a pointless test in the watch mask check. The `else if` condition is opposite to the previous `if` condition, making the expression always true. Caught by cppcheck - lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Linux/NativeRegisterContextLinux_arm.cpp:509:25: style: Expression is always true because 'else if' condition is opposite to previous condition at line 505. [multiCondition] Fix llvm#91223
xgupta
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 10, 2024
This issue is reported by cppcheck as a pointless test in the watch mask check. The `else if` condition is opposite to the previous `if` condition, making the expression always true. Caught by cppcheck - lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Linux/NativeRegisterContextLinux_arm.cpp:509:25: style: Expression is always true because 'else if' condition is opposite to previous condition at line 505. [multiCondition] Fix #91223
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Static analyser cppcheck says:
lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Linux/NativeRegisterContextLinux_arm.cpp:509:25: style: Expression is always true because 'else if' condition is opposite to previous condition at line 505. [multiCondition]
Source code is
if (watch_mask > 0x04)
....
else if (watch_mask <= 0x04)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: