Closed
Description
Bugzilla Link | 36898 |
Resolution | FIXED |
Resolved on | Apr 03, 2018 18:30 |
Version | trunk |
OS | All |
Blocks | #31672 |
CC | @RKSimon |
Extended Description
For example, this seems wrong
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_divps:
; GENERIC: # %bb.0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: vdivps %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [29:2.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: vdivps (%rdi), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [36:2.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]