-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.5k
LWG2593: Moved-from state of Allocators #100220
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
@llvm/issue-subscribers-c-20 Author: Christopher Di Bella (cjdb) |
Possibly nothing to do. I'm not aware of libc++ (or any other standard library implementation) even provided such a weird allocator type which did't meet the strengthened requirement. But the llvm-project/libcxx/test/support/test_allocator.h Lines 121 to 130 in 8b26c02
|
The resolution of LWG2593 didn't require the standard library implementation to change. It merely strengthened requirements on user-defined allocator types and allowed the implementation to make stronger assumptions. The status is tentatively set to Nothing To Do. However, `test_allocator` in libc++'s test suit needs to be fixed to conform to the strengthened requirements. Closes #100220.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Link: https://wg21.link/lwg2593
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: