@@ -295,9 +295,9 @@ A code snippet for such a walk looks like this:
295295.. code-block :: c++
296296
297297 MemoryDef *Def; // find who's optimized or defining for this MemoryDef
298- for (auto& U : Def->uses()) {
299- MemoryAccess *MA = cast<MemoryAccess>(Use .getUser());
300- if (auto *DefUser = cast_of_null <MemoryDef>MA )
298+ for (auto & U : Def->uses()) {
299+ MemoryAccess *MA = cast<MemoryAccess>(U .getUser());
300+ if (auto *DefUser = dyn_cast <MemoryDef>(MA) )
301301 if (DefUser->isOptimized() && DefUser->getOptimized() == Def) {
302302 // User who is optimized to Def
303303 } else {
@@ -312,19 +312,18 @@ the store.
312312.. code-block :: c++
313313
314314 checkUses(MemoryAccess *Def) { // Def can be a MemoryDef or a MemoryPhi.
315- for (auto& U : Def->uses()) {
316- MemoryAccess *MA = cast<MemoryAccess>(Use .getUser());
317- if (auto *MU = cast_of_null <MemoryUse>MA ) {
315+ for (auto & U : Def->uses()) {
316+ MemoryAccess *MA = cast<MemoryAccess>(U .getUser());
317+ if (auto *MU = dyn_cast <MemoryUse>(MA) ) {
318318 // Process MemoryUse as needed.
319- }
320- else {
319+ } else {
321320 // Process MemoryDef or MemoryPhi as needed.
322321
323322 // As a user can come up twice, as an optimized access and defining
324323 // access, keep a visited list.
325324
326325 // Check transitive uses as needed
327- checkUses (MA); // use a worklist for an iterative algorithm
326+ checkUses(MA); // use a worklist for an iterative algorithm
328327 }
329328 }
330329 }
0 commit comments