[SCEV] Replace IsAvailableOnEntry with block disposition

As far as I understand, the IsAvailableOnEntry() function basically
implements the same functionality as the properlyDominates() block
disposition. The primary difference (apart from a weaker
implementation) seems to be in this comment at the top:

    // Checks if the SCEV S is available at BB.  S is considered available at BB
    // if S can be materialized at BB without introducing a fault.

However, I don't really understand why there would be such a
requirement. It's my understanding that SCEV explicitly does not
care about trapping udiv instructions itself, and it's the job of
SCEVExpander's isSafeToExpand() to make sure these don't get
expanded if they may trap.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149344

Author: nikic

llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp

@@ -5890,90 +5890,6 @@ const SCEV *ScalarEvolution::createAddRecFromPHI(PHINode *PN) {
   return nullptr;
 }
 
-// Checks if the SCEV S is available at BB.  S is considered available at BB
-// if S can be materialized at BB without introducing a fault.
-static bool IsAvailableOnEntry(const Loop *L, DominatorTree &DT, const SCEV *S,
-                               BasicBlock *BB) {
-  struct CheckAvailable {
-    bool TraversalDone = false;
-    bool Available = true;
-
-    const Loop *L = nullptr;  // The loop BB is in (can be nullptr)
-    BasicBlock *BB = nullptr;
-    DominatorTree &DT;
-
-    CheckAvailable(const Loop *L, BasicBlock *BB, DominatorTree &DT)
-      : L(L), BB(BB), DT(DT) {}
-
-    bool setUnavailable() {
-      TraversalDone = true;
-      Available = false;
-      return false;
-    }
-
-    bool follow(const SCEV *S) {
-      switch (S->getSCEVType()) {
-      case scConstant:
-      case scVScale:
-      case scPtrToInt:
-      case scTruncate:
-      case scZeroExtend:
-      case scSignExtend:
-      case scAddExpr:
-      case scMulExpr:
-      case scUMaxExpr:
-      case scSMaxExpr:
-      case scUMinExpr:
-      case scSMinExpr:
-      case scSequentialUMinExpr:
-        // These expressions are available if their operand(s) is/are.
-        return true;
-
-      case scAddRecExpr: {
-        // We allow add recurrences that are on the loop BB is in, or some
-        // outer loop.  This guarantees availability because the value of the
-        // add recurrence at BB is simply the "current" value of the induction
-        // variable.  We can relax this in the future; for instance an add
-        // recurrence on a sibling dominating loop is also available at BB.
-        const auto *ARLoop = cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(S)->getLoop();
-        if (L && (ARLoop == L || ARLoop->contains(L)))
-          return true;
-
-        return setUnavailable();
-      }
-
-      case scUnknown: {
-        // For SCEVUnknown, we check for simple dominance.
-        const auto *SU = cast<SCEVUnknown>(S);
-        Value *V = SU->getValue();
-
-        if (isa<Argument>(V))
-          return false;
-
-        if (isa<Instruction>(V) && DT.dominates(cast<Instruction>(V), BB))
-          return false;
-
-        return setUnavailable();
-      }
-
-      case scUDivExpr:
-      case scCouldNotCompute:
-        // We do not try to smart about these at all.
-        return setUnavailable();
-      }
-      llvm_unreachable("Unknown SCEV kind!");
-    }
-
-    bool isDone() { return TraversalDone; }
-  };
-
-  CheckAvailable CA(L, BB, DT);
-  SCEVTraversal<CheckAvailable> ST(CA);
-
-  ST.visitAll(S);
-  return CA.Available;
-}
-
 // Try to match a control flow sequence that branches out at BI and merges back
 // at Merge into a "C ? LHS : RHS" select pattern.  Return true on a successful
 // match.
@@ -6011,8 +5927,6 @@ const SCEV *ScalarEvolution::createNodeFromSelectLikePHI(PHINode *PN) {
   auto IsReachable =
       [&](BasicBlock *BB) { return DT.isReachableFromEntry(BB); };
   if (PN->getNumIncomingValues() == 2 && all_of(PN->blocks(), IsReachable)) {
-    const Loop *L = LI.getLoopFor(PN->getParent());
-
     // Try to match
     //
     //  br %cond, label %left, label %right
@@ -6033,8 +5947,8 @@ const SCEV *ScalarEvolution::createNodeFromSelectLikePHI(PHINode *PN) {
 
     if (BI && BI->isConditional() &&
         BrPHIToSelect(DT, BI, PN, Cond, LHS, RHS) &&
-        IsAvailableOnEntry(L, DT, getSCEV(LHS), PN->getParent()) &&
-        IsAvailableOnEntry(L, DT, getSCEV(RHS), PN->getParent()))
+        properlyDominates(getSCEV(LHS), PN->getParent()) &&
+        properlyDominates(getSCEV(RHS), PN->getParent()))
       return createNodeForSelectOrPHI(PN, Cond, LHS, RHS);
   }
 

llvm/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/logical-operations.ll

@@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ define ptr @tautological_select_like_phi(i32 %tc) {
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    %iv = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %iv.next, %latch ]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    --> {0,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%loop> U: [0,101) S: [0,101) Exits: 100 LoopDispositions: { %loop: Computable }
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    %r = phi ptr [ @constant, %truebb ], [ @another_constant, %falsebb ]
-; CHECK-NEXT:    --> %r U: [0,-3) S: [-9223372036854775808,9223372036854775805) Exits: <<Unknown>> LoopDispositions: { %loop: Variant }
+; CHECK-NEXT:    --> @constant U: [0,-3) S: [-9223372036854775808,9223372036854775805) Exits: @constant LoopDispositions: { %loop: Invariant }
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    %iv.next = add i32 %iv, 1
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    --> {1,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%loop> U: [1,102) S: [1,102) Exits: 101 LoopDispositions: { %loop: Computable }
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  Determining loop execution counts for: @tautological_select_like_phi