Skip to content

fix: if-else-node handles missing optional file variables #15693

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 13, 2025

Conversation

lrhan321
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Fixes #15655

Screenshots

Before After
... ...

Checklist

Important

Please review the checklist below before submitting your pull request.

  • This change requires a documentation update, included: Dify Document
  • I understand that this PR may be closed in case there was no previous discussion or issues. (This doesn't apply to typos!)
  • I've added a test for each change that was introduced, and I tried as much as possible to make a single atomic change.
  • I've updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I ran dev/reformat(backend) and cd web && npx lint-staged(frontend) to appease the lint gods

@dosubot dosubot bot added size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. 🐞 bug Something isn't working labels Mar 13, 2025
@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Mar 13, 2025
@crazywoola
Copy link
Member

Awesome :0

@crazywoola crazywoola merged commit 12fa517 into langgenius:main Mar 13, 2025
6 checks passed
parambharat pushed a commit to parambharat/dify that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🐞 bug Something isn't working lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

IF-ELSE node fails when optional file variable is missing in workflow start node
2 participants