We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
All the IPFS URIs we have been using since v1 do not conform with the RFC3986 specs for URIs.
❌ /ipfs/QmZ3Cmnip8bmFNruuTuCdxPymEjyK9VcQEyf2beDYcaHaK/metaEvidence.json ✅ ipfs://QmZ3Cmnip8bmFNruuTuCdxPymEjyK9VcQEyf2beDYcaHaK/metaEvidence.json
/ipfs/QmZ3Cmnip8bmFNruuTuCdxPymEjyK9VcQEyf2beDYcaHaK/metaEvidence.json
ipfs://QmZ3Cmnip8bmFNruuTuCdxPymEjyK9VcQEyf2beDYcaHaK/metaEvidence.json
It should be relatively easy to fix, and we could even have a fallback for backward-compatibility.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
All the IPFS URIs we have been using since v1 do not conform with the RFC3986 specs for URIs.
❌
/ipfs/QmZ3Cmnip8bmFNruuTuCdxPymEjyK9VcQEyf2beDYcaHaK/metaEvidence.json
✅
ipfs://QmZ3Cmnip8bmFNruuTuCdxPymEjyK9VcQEyf2beDYcaHaK/metaEvidence.json
It should be relatively easy to fix, and we could even have a fallback for backward-compatibility.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: