Skip to content

Commit 53c6764

Browse files
Jiri OlsaNobody
authored andcommitted
selftests/bpf: Fix possible/online index mismatch in perf_buffer test
The perf_buffer fails on system with offline cpus: # test_progs -t perf_buffer serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_cpus 0 nsec serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_on_cpus 0 nsec serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:attach_kprobe 0 nsec serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buf__new 0 nsec serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:epoll_fd 0 nsec skipping offline CPU #4 serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buffer__poll 0 nsec serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:seen_cpu_cnt 0 nsec serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:buf_cnt 0 nsec ... serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:fd_check 0 nsec serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:drain_buf 0 nsec serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:consume_buf 0 nsec serial_test_perf_buffer:FAIL:cpu_seen cpu 5 not seen #88 perf_buffer:FAIL Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED If the offline cpu is from the middle of the possible set, we get mismatch with possible and online cpu buffers. The perf buffer test calls perf_buffer__consume_buffer for all 'possible' cpus, but the library holds only 'online' cpu buffers and perf_buffer__consume_buffer returns them based on index. Adding extra (online) index to keep track of online buffers, we need the original (possible) index to trigger trace on proper cpu. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
1 parent 5debf33 commit 53c6764

File tree

1 file changed

+7
-6
lines changed

1 file changed

+7
-6
lines changed

tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c

Lines changed: 7 additions & 6 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ int trigger_on_cpu(int cpu)
4545

4646
void serial_test_perf_buffer(void)
4747
{
48-
int err, on_len, nr_on_cpus = 0, nr_cpus, i;
48+
int err, on_len, nr_on_cpus = 0, nr_cpus, i, j;
4949
struct perf_buffer_opts pb_opts = {};
5050
struct test_perf_buffer *skel;
5151
cpu_set_t cpu_seen;
@@ -111,28 +111,29 @@ void serial_test_perf_buffer(void)
111111
"got %zu, expected %d\n", perf_buffer__buffer_cnt(pb), nr_on_cpus))
112112
goto out_close;
113113

114-
for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; i++) {
114+
for (i = 0, j = 0; i < nr_cpus; i++) {
115115
if (i >= on_len || !online[i])
116116
continue;
117117

118-
fd = perf_buffer__buffer_fd(pb, i);
118+
fd = perf_buffer__buffer_fd(pb, j);
119119
CHECK(fd < 0 || last_fd == fd, "fd_check", "last fd %d == fd %d\n", last_fd, fd);
120120
last_fd = fd;
121121

122-
err = perf_buffer__consume_buffer(pb, i);
122+
err = perf_buffer__consume_buffer(pb, j);
123123
if (CHECK(err, "drain_buf", "cpu %d, err %d\n", i, err))
124124
goto out_close;
125125

126126
CPU_CLR(i, &cpu_seen);
127127
if (trigger_on_cpu(i))
128128
goto out_close;
129129

130-
err = perf_buffer__consume_buffer(pb, i);
131-
if (CHECK(err, "consume_buf", "cpu %d, err %d\n", i, err))
130+
err = perf_buffer__consume_buffer(pb, j);
131+
if (CHECK(err, "consume_buf", "cpu %d, err %d\n", j, err))
132132
goto out_close;
133133

134134
if (CHECK(!CPU_ISSET(i, &cpu_seen), "cpu_seen", "cpu %d not seen\n", i))
135135
goto out_close;
136+
j++;
136137
}
137138

138139
out_free_pb:

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)