Skip to content

Define "vocabularies" and other related terms. #488

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 16, 2017

Conversation

handrews
Copy link
Contributor

This should clear up terms which were being used without proper definitions, and explain the rationale for vocabularies more clearly.

Addresses #480.

People routinely file a "bug" that the validation type "integer"
is not listed in the core spec.  Explain why that is on purpose.
These will go into subscections, so they need to be indented
further and in some cases re-wrapped.
There are no content changes in this commit, only formatting.
Actually add the sections and rework the contents to make sense
in this order.  Define more terms that were being used without
clear definition before.
@handrews handrews merged commit 5f305b8 into json-schema-org:master Nov 16, 2017
@handrews handrews deleted the define-vocab branch November 16, 2017 20:21
@gregsdennis gregsdennis added clarification Items that need to be clarified in the specification and removed Type: Maintenance labels Jul 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
clarification Items that need to be clarified in the specification core Priority: High
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants