Create a new guideline describing overall PR Review process

[Utkarsh-123github]

Description

To ensure consistency, clarity, and efficiency across all contributions, we need to define a comprehensive guideline for the Pull Request (PR) review process. This document should serve as a go-to reference for both contributors and maintainers, outlining the expectations, standards, and steps involved during PR reviews.

Task

Create a markdown file (e.g., PR_REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md) that describes the overall PR review process in a clear and concise manner.

[Utkarsh-123github]

Hi @benjagm , if this is approved, then I would like to work on this .
Thank you !

[gregsdennis]

I believe we already have a review process. We set this up over a year ago when we started to get a large influx of contributors, mainly from GSoC.

https://github.com/json-schema-org/community/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md

This is pretty comprehensive. I'm not sure what you'd want to add.

[Utkarsh-123github]

Hi @gregsdennis ,
I hope you're doing well.

I just wanted to share a quick note regarding this. Benjamin and I had a discussion around it, and there we discussed like just as we have a guideline in place for issue triage, it might be helpful to introduce a similar guideline for the PR triage process as well which directly relates to the PR triage board.

Through this issue, my intention is to propose creating such a guideline, with the aim of making the overall contribution and review workflow smoother and more consistent. Please checkout this gist where I have summarized the overall process related to my idea.

Please let me know your thoughts and further any guidance/suggestions related to this.
Thank You!

[benjagm]

Hi Greg and @Utkarsh-123github . This is a document to help coordinating the Triage Group working in the website repo. We are using a board for speed-up the reviews and maybe having this process documented could help onboard others. WDYT?