Skip to content

Open Community Working Meeting 2023-06-26 - 14:00 PT #420

Closed
@benjagm

Description

@benjagm

Open Community Working Meeting 2023-06-26 - 14:00 PT

📺 See Recording

Go To Previous Meeting

Agenda:

Topic Owner Decision/NextStep
Review last call's action items [facilitator]
Let's discuss this Comment part of the JSON Schema Charter discussion regarding what our concerns should be around validation of JSON data or more than just JSON data @Relequestual Use JSON-compatible data instead of JSON data.
#300 - Website Analytics @benjagm Create a free account of Plausible and and upgrade once the new site is in production.

Action items:

  • @Relequestual to modify the Charter to use JSON-compatible data instead of JSON data.
  • @benjagm to create an issue to check with other Community members if we can adopt the thumbs up/thumbs down method to indicate plan to attend meetings.
  • @benjagm to create a free account of Plausible and reflect it in the infrastructure.md file.
  • @benjagm to check with GSoC contributors if everything is OK.

Notes:

  • @Relequestual suggested using a thumbs up/thumbs down method to indicate plans to attend for meetings and @benjagm committed to create an issue to check with other Community members.
  • The team reviewed the status of the action items of the previous session.
  • The group discussed the scope of the project's validation of JSON data (see comment). They considered modifying the phrasing of "JSON data" to better reflect the fact that it's the JSON data model that they've constructed, and also discussed the possibility of supporting other JSON-compatible formats.
  • The group discussed the compatibility of Jason's schema with other formats, such as YAML, and agreed that anything compatible with JSON would be part of their scope. They also emphasized the importance of leaving the door open to syntaxes that can be translated into JSON.
  • The team agreed on start using Plausible as a solution for web analytics, which was agreed Website Analytics  #300 . They planned to start with the free account and upgrade to the paid version during the testing period before going live to production.
  • The team discussed the commitment of the GSoC contributors and @benjagm committed to check with them and make sure they attend the sessions and continue with their contributions.

Attendees

Account
@jdesrosiers
@Relequestual
@benjagm
@gregsdennis

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions