Skip to content

fix: update binutils pattern #4077

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 24, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ffontaine
Copy link
Contributor

Fix binutils pattern to return 2.32.0 instead of 2.32.0.20190204 from the following string:

Linux version 4.14.206-perf (oe-user@oe-host) (clang version 6.0.9 for Android NDK, GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.32.0.20190204) #1 PREEMPT Mon Jan 29 09:57:30 UTC 2024

Fix binutils pattern to return 2.32.0 instead of 2.32.0.20190204 from
the following string:

Linux version 4.14.206-perf (oe-user@oe-host) (clang version 6.0.9 for Android NDK, GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.32.0.20190204) #1 PREEMPT Mon Jan 29 09:57:30 UTC 2024

Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine <[email protected]>
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Apr 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.90%. Comparing base (d6cbe40) to head (55c0a45).
Report is 185 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4077      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.41%   80.90%   +5.48%     
==========================================
  Files         808      822      +14     
  Lines       11983    12699     +716     
  Branches     1598     1978     +380     
==========================================
+ Hits         9037    10274    +1237     
+ Misses       2593     2010     -583     
- Partials      353      415      +62     
Flag Coverage Δ
longtests 79.98% <ø> (+4.56%) ⬆️
win-longtests 78.71% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@terriko terriko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ahh, versions are the worst. I wonder how long before someone files a CVE with the date stamp in and we have to work with those, but I think we should deal with that later if it becomes an issue.

Thank you!

@terriko terriko merged commit 878254e into intel:main Apr 24, 2024
22 checks passed
@ffontaine ffontaine deleted the fix-binutils-checker branch April 25, 2024 06:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants