This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 29, 2024. It is now read-only.
Parameter binding for client's query() method
#678
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Rebasing to #679, hoping it will eventually get merged. |
|
rebased to master (let me know when rebases stop being acceptable) to remove #679 now that travis is fixed |
|
@clslgrnc can you add a changelog entry please? |
|
Done. |
|
lgtm, thank you @clslgrnc! |
LloydW93
pushed a commit
to bbc/influxdb-python
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2019
* add bind_params to query * tutorial for bind_params
tux-00
pushed a commit
to tux-00/influxdb-python
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2019
* add bind_params to query * tutorial for bind_params
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #603, closes #316. Enables the following:
The last commit ensures all tests pass and is unrelated to the rest of this PR (feel free to revert it, #671 is probably a better suggestion).