Skip to content

Prepare release #386

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 28, 2021
Merged

Prepare release #386

merged 5 commits into from
Dec 28, 2021

Conversation

michaelpj
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Bump major version of lsp to match lsp-types
  • Update changelogs (manually, I can't figure out how to make GenChangelogs nice with multiple packages)
  • A few pieces in CONTRIBUTING

I'm going to build HLS with this branch just to check that I haven't messed anything up.

@michaelpj michaelpj requested a review from jneira December 28, 2021 13:52
* Reduced dependency footprint (#383, #384) (@Bodigrim)
* Use appropriate number types (#366) (@michaelpj)
* Fix for #374 (#376) (@pepeiborra)
* Fix virtual file name adding .hs extension (#364) (@heitor-lassarote, @jneira)
Copy link
Member

@jneira jneira Dec 28, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
* Fix virtual file name adding .hs extension (#364) (@heitor-lassarote, @jneira)
* Fix virtual file name adding .hs extension (#364) (@heitor-lassarote)

I did not meaningful change in that pr (afair :-P)

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You landed it!

Copy link
Member

@jneira jneira left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great, sad to see GenChangelog does not work out of the box.
However hls is multipackage and we use it, we dont have separate changelogs though. Separating prs after a quick look to affected paths would not be feasible?

@jneira
Copy link
Member

jneira commented Dec 28, 2021

I'm going to build HLS with this branch just to check that I haven't messed anything up.

We have to adapt hls to last changes here haskell/haskell-language-server#2494, no?

@michaelpj
Copy link
Collaborator Author

However hls is multipackage andwe use it, we dont have separate changelogs though. Separating prs after a quick look to affected paths woult not be feasible?

Oh hm, yes, I guess I could have done that! I just assumed we wanted it to be cleverer than that :p well, I did it manually this time!

We have to adapt hls to last changes here haskell/haskell-language-server#2494, no?

Yeah, exactly, that's what I'm doing.

@michaelpj
Copy link
Collaborator Author

HLS on the branch builds and the tests pass, let's do it.

@michaelpj michaelpj merged commit 08e8a72 into master Dec 28, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants