forked from diffblue/cbmc
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Adjustments to validator #7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
thk123
wants to merge
16
commits into
hannes-steffenhagen-diffblue:ci/xsd-validation
Choose a base branch
from
thk123:adjustments-to-validator
base: ci/xsd-validation
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Adjustments to validator #7
thk123
wants to merge
16
commits into
hannes-steffenhagen-diffblue:ci/xsd-validation
from
thk123:adjustments-to-validator
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
4 tasks
5f02606
to
18ca4aa
Compare
…the developer manual
18ca4aa
to
ffd35ff
Compare
The incremental status should report failure from the first unwinding for which one property is falsified.
It is not possible to conclude successful verification before the unwinding has finished, so this prints inconclusive until the analysis is complete. However, if one property has been falsified, then even though the analysis can continue to check other properties, the verification will certainly fail.
We want to print the status after we've done any solving for that unwind, but before we've done an extra step of symexing. We should not print in the event the full equation has been generated, as then we have a full solution so ins't incremental. Ditto we don't need to print the status if we've found a failure, as this function will be called again to do the next symex invocation if there are further propreties to check
We now print after all solving, and the last thing before the next increment, therefore the printing checks are easier to check immediately precedes the next unwinding, rather than checking appears after the increment we are talking about.
In this case, the status is inconclusive until completion, at which point success will be reported by CBMC overall.
ffd35ff
to
cd578d9
Compare
…-manual Fix dead links in cbmc user manual
…emental-solving Incremental solving producing cprover status as it goes
Add documentation for memory primitives
…/xsd-validation Add validation tests for trace XSD
774cd38
to
5b3640a
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Addressing review comments.
I expect this to fail - CIs without dependencies now need to explicitly not run this test suite
@hannes-steffenhagen-diffblue If this passes, feel free to incorporate into your PR, squashing as you see fit.