Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Async-await: Base types for client implementation #1243
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Async-await: Base types for client implementation #1243
Changes from all commits
20511ca
09a8d2f
3cd7a9a
54fd85e
d37ace0
a5d683b
6f4a32f
a94d5cd
43eab0b
7b88a7f
c4ad3d8
9c5f430
d639a32
a04ef2a
e3e3f07
770106e
6896061
da1cd58
6a34d96
99a6292
497c8a0
135935c
e8c1059
8babddc
ebb4715
21a06b6
4c99b1f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Where did we land with
GRPCAsync{Client,Bidirectional}StreamingCall
having a request-stream or similar?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's an unresolved thread above which I found a reply that I wrote but forgot to send. It's here: #1243 (comment).
I thought we were deferring this until we had the writer that supports backpressure?