Skip to content

Explain alternative way to specify schema in tutorial. #56

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2016
Merged

Explain alternative way to specify schema in tutorial. #56

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2016

Conversation

dukebody
Copy link
Contributor

Dunno if this can be confusing to the reader, but I think that specifying the schema directly in the urls.py file URL declaration looks cleaner and should be advertised to the user.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 12, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 92.326% when pulling e72f6b2 on dukebody:graphqlview-schema-explicit into bb0b4fa on graphql-python:master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 92.326% when pulling e72f6b2 on dukebody:graphqlview-schema-explicit into bb0b4fa on graphql-python:master.

@syrusakbary syrusakbary merged commit dd07cb1 into graphql-python:master Nov 14, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@dukebody @coveralls @syrusakbary