-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18k
cmd/gc: Camlistore crash after recent gc change #8961
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
Milestone
Comments
CL https://golang.org/cl/154540044 mentions this issue. |
This issue was closed by revision 0edafef. Status changed to Fixed. |
Issue #8911 has been merged into this issue. |
Issue #8911 has been merged into this issue. |
Yes, http://build.camlistore.org/ went "ok" right that change. |
I take it back. I really don't know if it has been fixed by revision 98477b56eb36. I was confused by https://golang.org/issue/8911?c=4 comment on a dup issue. The comment is (I can see it now) unrelated to this issue. Sorry. Alex |
Issue #8911 has been merged into this issue. |
wheatman
pushed a commit
to wheatman/go-akaros
that referenced
this issue
Jun 25, 2018
https://golang.org/cl/152700045/ made it possible for struct literals assigned to globals to use <N> as the RHS. Normally, this is to zero out variables on first use. Because globals are already zero (or their linker initialized value), we just ignored this. Now that <N> can occur from non-initialization code, we need to emit this code. We don't use <N> for initialization of globals any more, so this shouldn't cause any excessive zeroing. Fixes golang#8961. LGTM=rsc R=golang-codereviews, rsc CC=bradfitz, golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/154540044
wheatman
pushed a commit
to wheatman/go-akaros
that referenced
this issue
Jun 26, 2018
https://golang.org/cl/152700045/ made it possible for struct literals assigned to globals to use <N> as the RHS. Normally, this is to zero out variables on first use. Because globals are already zero (or their linker initialized value), we just ignored this. Now that <N> can occur from non-initialization code, we need to emit this code. We don't use <N> for initialization of globals any more, so this shouldn't cause any excessive zeroing. Fixes golang#8961. LGTM=rsc R=golang-codereviews, rsc CC=bradfitz, golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/154540044
wheatman
pushed a commit
to wheatman/go-akaros
that referenced
this issue
Jul 9, 2018
https://golang.org/cl/152700045/ made it possible for struct literals assigned to globals to use <N> as the RHS. Normally, this is to zero out variables on first use. Because globals are already zero (or their linker initialized value), we just ignored this. Now that <N> can occur from non-initialization code, we need to emit this code. We don't use <N> for initialization of globals any more, so this shouldn't cause any excessive zeroing. Fixes golang#8961. LGTM=rsc R=golang-codereviews, rsc CC=bradfitz, golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/154540044
wheatman
pushed a commit
to wheatman/go-akaros
that referenced
this issue
Jul 30, 2018
https://golang.org/cl/152700045/ made it possible for struct literals assigned to globals to use <N> as the RHS. Normally, this is to zero out variables on first use. Because globals are already zero (or their linker initialized value), we just ignored this. Now that <N> can occur from non-initialization code, we need to emit this code. We don't use <N> for initialization of globals any more, so this shouldn't cause any excessive zeroing. Fixes golang#8961. LGTM=rsc R=golang-codereviews, rsc CC=bradfitz, golang-codereviews https://golang.org/cl/154540044
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: