Description
What version of Go are you using (go version
)?
$ go version go version devel go1.19-db875f4d1b Mon May 16 16:15:58 2022 +0000 darwin/arm64 $ go1.18 version go version go1.18.2 darwin/arm64
Does this issue reproduce with the latest release?
The problem is present in Go 1.18 and in the development tip.
What operating system and processor architecture are you using (go env
)?
go env
Output
$ go env GO111MODULE="" GOARCH="arm64" GOBIN="" GOCACHE="/Users/rhys/Library/Caches/go-build" GOENV="/Users/rhys/Library/Application Support/go/env" GOEXE="" GOEXPERIMENT="" GOFLAGS="" GOHOSTARCH="arm64" GOHOSTOS="darwin" GOINSECURE="" GOMODCACHE="/Users/rhys/go/pkg/mod" GONOPROXY="*" GONOSUMDB="*" GOOS="darwin" GOPATH="/Users/rhys/go" GOPRIVATE="*" GOPROXY="direct" GOROOT="/usr/local/go" GOSUMDB="sum.golang.org" GOTMPDIR="" GOTOOLDIR="/usr/local/go/pkg/tool/darwin_arm64" GOVCS="" GOVERSION="devel go1.19-db875f4d1b Mon May 16 16:15:58 2022 +0000" GCCGO="gccgo" AR="ar" CC="clang" CXX="clang++" CGO_ENABLED="1" GOMOD="/dev/null" GOWORK="" CGO_CFLAGS="-g -O2" CGO_CPPFLAGS="" CGO_CXXFLAGS="-g -O2" CGO_FFLAGS="-g -O2" CGO_LDFLAGS="-g -O2" PKG_CONFIG="pkg-config" GOGCCFLAGS="-fPIC -arch arm64 -pthread -fno-caret-diagnostics -Qunused-arguments -fmessage-length=0 -fdebug-prefix-map=/var/folders/lf/n4ry0qv5639_3z0nhyhy3z7c0000gs/T/go-build743809376=/tmp/go-build -gno-record-gcc-switches -fno-common"
What did you do?
// Copyright 2022 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
package main
import (
"fmt"
"os"
"sync"
"sync/atomic"
"time"
)
const duration = 2000 * time.Millisecond
const workers = 3
var stop int32
func main() {
time.AfterFunc(duration, func() { atomic.StoreInt32(&stop, 1) })
var wg sync.WaitGroup
wg.Add(1)
go func() { wg.Done() }()
for i := 0; i < workers; i++ {
wg.Add(1)
go func() {
wg.Done()
churn()
}()
}
wg.Wait()
if atomic.LoadInt32(&stop) == 1 {
fmt.Printf("PROBLEM: first goroutine did not get a chance to run\n")
os.Exit(1)
}
fmt.Printf("ok\n")
}
func churn() {
if atomic.LoadInt32(&stop) == 0 {
go churn()
}
}
What did you expect to see?
I expected each goroutine in the program to get a chance to run within a few 10ms scheduling intervals. The result of that would be for both wg.Done calls to execute, for the wg.Wait call to complete, and for the program to exit quickly without error.
What did you see instead?
When I run the test program with GOMAXPROCS=1, the new goroutine launches keep the runtime busy so it does not give all existing goroutines a chance to run. The goroutine that does nothing but call wg.Done does not get a chance to run until the timer expiration stops the new goroutine launches after 2000 milliseconds.
This isn't specific to GOMAXPROCS=1, additional calls to go churn()
can keep additional scheduler threads busy.
Refined from an original report in #52916. CC @golang/runtime
$ GOMAXPROCS=1 go run ~/Documents/src/nursery/issue/golang/go/52xxx/churn.go
PROBLEM: first goroutine did not get a chance to run
exit status 1
$ GOMAXPROCS=2 go run ~/Documents/src/nursery/issue/golang/go/52xxx/churn.go
PROBLEM: first goroutine did not get a chance to run
exit status 1
$ GOMAXPROCS=3 go run ~/Documents/src/nursery/issue/golang/go/52xxx/churn.go
PROBLEM: first goroutine did not get a chance to run
exit status 1
$ GOMAXPROCS=4 go run ~/Documents/src/nursery/issue/golang/go/52xxx/churn.go
ok
$ GOMAXPROCS=1 go1.18 run ~/Documents/src/nursery/issue/golang/go/52xxx/churn.go
PROBLEM: first goroutine did not get a chance to run
exit status 1
$ GOMAXPROCS=2 go1.18 run ~/Documents/src/nursery/issue/golang/go/52xxx/churn.go
PROBLEM: first goroutine did not get a chance to run
exit status 1
$ GOMAXPROCS=3 go1.18 run ~/Documents/src/nursery/issue/golang/go/52xxx/churn.go
PROBLEM: first goroutine did not get a chance to run
exit status 1
$ GOMAXPROCS=4 go1.18 run ~/Documents/src/nursery/issue/golang/go/52xxx/churn.go
ok
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Type
Projects
Status