DialFunc needs a timeout parameter

[pcekm]

The DSN contains a timeout parameter that is passed to the standard net.Dialer. Please provide this to custom dialers as well.

[arnehormann]

Sorry for replying late.

Just set the timeout parameter yourself in the Dialfunc.
You provide and implement it, you can set a timeout.

If that's not possible, please tell us why.

[pcekm]

For the same reason you provide an address parameter. A DialFunc is registered once for a given network type, but it's used to create multiple connections. Those connections may have different addresses and different timeouts.

[julienschmidt]

The addr part of the DSN is not touched by the driver and passed as is to the dial function. One could include a timeout parameter in the addr part and extract the value in the custom dial function.
But this wouldn't be a nice solution IMO.

In case we modify the DialFunc type, should we just add a timeout parameter or should be do something more extensible, like passing a map somehow? How realistic is it, that a dialer needs access to another parameter?

[pcekm]

A timeout parameter satisfies my purposes, although someone else could conceivably want the tls parameter. In any case, something more extensible might prevent the need to change the interface again. A struct containing some (or all) of the values parsed from the DSN would be better than a map, though, since each field would have the correct type and would appear in godoc with comments.

[arnehormann]

If we do so, there's a potential synergy with #224.

Assuming

type Dsn struct {
    User string
    Password string
    Protocol string
    Address string
    Schema string
    // enforce and clarify that every parameter only appears once and is position independent
    Params map[string]string
}

We just move the logic in MySQLDriver.Open(dsn string) to Dsn.Open() and export a new ParseDsn(dsn string).
MySQLDriver.Open(dsn string) just calls ParseDsn(dsn).Open().

[Freeaqingme]

I understand this is not a trivial issue to fix, but what are we going to do with it? Personally I feel my proposed patch would be a good compromise for now, while we ponder some more on the desired solution for how we handle some of the magic that's been currently implemented.

Edit: I think this should have been posted as part of #346 not this thread...

[methane]

Go 1.8 adds Context support to database/sql.
When we support Context, I think option is not necessary. Right?

[pcekm]

It doesn't change this issue. Context support is being added for database operations such as Exec and Prepare. The timeout parameter determines how long to try opening a connection to the backend (i.e. Driver.Open), and there still won't be a context on that.

[shogo82148]

I implemented the driver.DriverContext interface in #778,
it allows to cancel the context during handshaking.
And I'm going to implement RegisterDialContext
( shogo82148@89cc76d ).

They solves this issue, doesn't them?