Skip to content

Modify pagination in page of commits #3766

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 8, 2018
Merged

Conversation

phtan
Copy link
Contributor

@phtan phtan commented Apr 5, 2018

Re. issue #3716

I wanted to check if the changes that I have made are viewed as acceptable, because I observed that the code that I indirectly refer to (namely, paginate.tmpl )was last modified in the year 2017 A.D. (and the format of the hyperlinks may have changed since then, if you know what I am referring to.)

Here's a screenshot: (I draw your attention to the navigation at the bottom of the image)
screenshot from 2018-04-06 05 38 03

I wanted navigation to the page "first" and the page
"last" of the pages of commits. I discovered this
has already been implemented in one of the templates.

Signed-off-by: Tan Pheng Heong <[email protected]>
@lunny lunny added the type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality label Apr 6, 2018
@lunny lunny added this to the 1.x.x milestone Apr 6, 2018
@lunny lunny added type/refactoring Existing code has been cleaned up. There should be no new functionality. and removed type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality labels Apr 6, 2018
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Apr 6, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #3766 into master will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #3766      +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage   22.91%   22.9%   -0.02%     
=========================================
  Files         124     124              
  Lines       24750   24750              
=========================================
- Hits         5672    5669       -3     
- Misses      18216   18218       +2     
- Partials      862     863       +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
modules/process/manager.go 69.56% <0%> (-4.35%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7000b41...f23ac61. Read the comment docs.

@bkcsoft bkcsoft added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Apr 6, 2018
@bkcsoft bkcsoft added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Apr 6, 2018
@bkcsoft bkcsoft added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Apr 6, 2018
@lunny lunny modified the milestones: 1.x.x, 1.5.0 Apr 7, 2018
@lunny lunny merged commit 1610296 into go-gitea:master Apr 8, 2018
@phtan phtan deleted the issue-3716 branch April 9, 2018 10:28
@lafriks lafriks added the type/changelog Adds the changelog for a new Gitea version label Apr 11, 2018
@phtan
Copy link
Contributor Author

phtan commented Apr 12, 2018

Thank you @bkcsoft , @lafriks , @appleboy , @lunny , @JonasFranzDEV , @Bwko for your effort on the PR. (I listed your user-names in no particular order, to clarify).

@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 24, 2020
@delvh delvh removed the type/changelog Adds the changelog for a new Gitea version label Oct 7, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/refactoring Existing code has been cleaned up. There should be no new functionality.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants