Skip to content

Revert "Replies to outdated code comments should also be outdated" #13439

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

lunny
Copy link
Member

@lunny lunny commented Nov 6, 2020

Copy link
Member

@BetaCat0 BetaCat0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. label Nov 6, 2020
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Nov 6, 2020
@lafriks lafriks merged commit 35cc82a into master Nov 6, 2020
@lafriks lafriks deleted the revert-13217-comments-on-review-should-have-the-same-sha branch November 6, 2020 07:04
@zeripath
Copy link
Contributor

zeripath commented Nov 6, 2020

This should not have been reverted. The migration should have been fixed.

@lunny
Copy link
Member Author

lunny commented Nov 7, 2020

It's not quick to fix that PR when I found the problem because of different database pagination SQL. Since the PR is only online for several hours, so I think revert is the quickest method to prevent more people to upgrade to that commit.

@6543
Copy link
Member

6543 commented Nov 7, 2020

migrations with raw SQL just need more 👀 on review ...

@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 14, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants