Skip to content

Team's members and repos lists sorting order #6446

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
2 of 7 tasks
ngourdon opened this issue Mar 27, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #6525
Closed
2 of 7 tasks

Team's members and repos lists sorting order #6446

ngourdon opened this issue Mar 27, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #6525
Labels
topic/ui Change the appearance of the Gitea UI
Milestone

Comments

@ngourdon
Copy link
Contributor

  • Gitea version (or commit ref): 1.8.0-rc1
  • Git version: 2.19.1
  • Operating system: Linux
  • Database (use [x]):
    • PostgreSQL
    • MySQL
    • MSSQL
    • SQLite
  • Can you reproduce the bug at https://try.gitea.io:
    • Yes (provide example URL)
    • No
    • Not relevant
  • Log gist:

Description

The team's members list and the team's repos list are not ordered.
I would like the lists to be orderded by name.

https://try.gitea.io/org/ng-org/teams/ng-team

@techknowlogick techknowlogick added type/proposal The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first. topic/ui Change the appearance of the Gitea UI labels Mar 27, 2019
zeripath pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 7, 2019
* sort team's repositories by name

* sort team members by display name
@lafriks lafriks added this to the 1.9.0 milestone Apr 8, 2019
@lafriks lafriks removed the type/proposal The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first. label Apr 8, 2019
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 24, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
topic/ui Change the appearance of the Gitea UI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants