-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
Fix prebuild open #14019
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Fix prebuild open #14019
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting that you're using
CommitContext.computeHash
here instead of usingcontext.originalContext.revision
directly. I guess this adds support for the case where:However, do we actually want to delete the
ref
in this case? 🤔 I'm not fully certain of the consequences on the additional repositories.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, on a side note, would you be okay with using a single
if
statement with 3 conditions, instead of two nestedif
blocks? (But I'm aware that's mostly personal preference, so please feel free to disregard this suggestion.)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wanted to make sure that the original logic was still available in the case that
CommitContext.is(context.originalContext)
was not true.I wasn't sure that
originalContext
would always be aCommitContext
and didn't want to break anything since there weren't specific unit tests for that block.If you think it looks good, I can update it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I saw it being used elsewhere when reading through some code and it made sense... I hadn't looked at the Interface for
CommitContext
too closely nor the definition forcomputeHash
. Makse sense to me to userevision
instead. Let me know what you think and I can make that change.