rn20: musl libc vs NO_REGEX / REG_STARTEND #196
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add description of discussion about Git no longer working with musl libc's regex implementation out of the box (without setting `NO_REGEX=1` in build configuration).
|
@jnareb great, thanks again! |
|
Actually I will move it into the "Support" section as it seems better given the title. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add description of discussion about Git no longer working with musl libc's regex implementation out of the box (without setting
NO_REGEX=1in build configuration).I'm not sure if it is worth including, but I think it might be interesting (the relying on POSIX issue, and no code is easier maintenance). Also, perhaps it could be in "Support" instead.
Might need style tuneups, and perhaps byline.