Skip to content

fix: Always use ? for anonymous function name #5664

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

timfish
Copy link
Collaborator

@timfish timfish commented Aug 31, 2022

Closes #5523

This moves the '?' string to @sentry/utils so it only exists once in the bundle.

@timfish timfish force-pushed the fix/normalize-anon-fn-to-question-mark branch from 278b227 to 6c22fa5 Compare August 31, 2022 17:09
Copy link
Member

@Lms24 Lms24 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@timfish timfish marked this pull request as draft September 1, 2022 12:57
@timfish
Copy link
Collaborator Author

timfish commented Sep 1, 2022

Abhi has marked this for v8.0.0 since this is technically a breaking change

@AbhiPrasad AbhiPrasad added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Sep 1, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has gone three weeks without activity. In another week, I will close it.

But! If you comment or otherwise update it, I will reset the clock, and if you label it Status: Backlog or Status: In Progress, I will leave it alone ... forever!


"A weed is but an unloved flower." ― Ella Wheeler Wilcox 🥀

@AbhiPrasad
Copy link
Member

@timfish let's close this to clean up the PRs stream, but we should re-open and merge once v8 is ready.

@AbhiPrasad AbhiPrasad closed this Jan 30, 2023
AbhiPrasad pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2024
This was previously opened as #5664 but closed as it was a breaking
change. Now that we're getting ready to ship, v8 this is viable!
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Stack parsers use both ? and <anonymous> to denote anonymous functions
3 participants